Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
s73v3r_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
151.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
Good. There is zero reason why that person should be able to close off access to the beach. It is crazy that, because of his wealth, he's able to just eat the fine that comes from doing so.
152.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
Some have, but what are the numbers on that? Do more handle the switch ok (not even great, but in the "The company isn't going to tank" sense), or do more have problems and need to be replaced, if only for a while?
153.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
Usually in that situation, you both show your phones, to show you're doing it.
154.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
Isn't this a story about them doing just that, though?
155.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
If they're stealing, yes.
156.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
You’ve just made my point that all these examples of “anti-conservative bias” are really just bigoted or mysogynistic positions that are dressed up with junk science.
157.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
Which is clearly an incorrect definition of the term. Fox News was only negative on Obama, yet I never heard him say they were the enemy of the people.
158.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
I can't say I can agree with that in the slightest, especially regarding NPR. I would say that they refuse to follow up on those assertions with conservatives quite often. As far as embedding, I believe that is at the discretion of the
159.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
If the House flips, that won't take effect til January. So the hearing will probably continue as scheduled, just with a Lame Duck Congress. Whether that means they'll be more blustery or less would remain to be seen.
160.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
"current admin believes “ fake news” rather than “the press” are the enemy of the people." But they also define "fake news" to be any outlet that isn't praising them constantly.
161.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
Why would they do this, instead of continue with the iPad Pro?
162.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
Why would it be toward zero? The authors of the software still have to eat.
163.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
Are you? Wouldn't you prefer that software vendors can support themselves selling the software, and thus be able to update it?
164.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
If they're doing something this blatantly in violation, then I hope the EU comes down hard on them.
165.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
You mean when someone openly says to their LGBT employees, 'You are less valuable. You are not deserving of the same basic rights as straight people. You are second class citizens'? Mozilla seems to be doing just fine.
166.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
But you gave the false dichotomy that to do that, you have to be an asshole. That's purely not true.
167.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
Absolutely. That doesn't mean you have to tell them you wish they were retroactively aborted.
168.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
If you had someone who was technically deficient, would you just push them away, or would you push them to get better? Why not the same with someone who doesn't have the best interpersonal skills? Why shouldn't we push those peopl
169.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
The problem is, it's not just the intended targets that go away with that behavior. A lot of spectators who see that decide they no longer wish to put themselves through that, and leave as well.
170.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
There was a season of This Old House from a couple years ago where they were putting together a kind of pre-fab house. It was somewhat custom, but all the walls and floors and things were made into panels, and assembled in a factory, indoor
171.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
No, because you're never going to do that, and in trying, you're probably going to cause yourself to send out more insults to others. You're also going to normalize a culture of calling everyone a "stupid pile of sheet&q
172.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
"Engineers care about facts not so much about sentiment." Some engineers do. But all are still people who have feelings, and the sentiment of the message can definitely affect and hurt them.
173.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
Nobody, anywhere, for any of these projects, has ever suggested that bad code be accepted just to make someone feel better. That has always been an excuse used by the anti-CoC people, and has always been without merit.
174.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
I mean, as the leader of the project, he is the one who sets the culture and the norms.
175.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
" there's no reason to cripple good open source software" Nobody is doing that. No one. That is not happening at all. I'm sorry, but people not being assholes to each other is not going to affect the quality of software
176.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
No, you don't get to pull that. You have not provided a shred of evidence of anything, so of course no one is going to be convinced by your ranting.
177.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
Yes, there's a failure. You've not provided any evidence that someone was banned because of "conservative views". Not a single shred. Thus, you're clearly not wanting to discuss in good faith, and you just want to f
178.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
I don't want a bargain. I want those companies to stop tracking, and actually respect privacy.
179.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
I don't see why any of that is relevant, though.
180.
▲
by
s73v3r_
8y ago
" Why should Google suffer" 1. I reject any notion that Google is somehow "suffering" if they don't go into China. 2. You're making it seem like Google is entitled to all the business it wants. That's not
More ›