s73v3r_

83 ms·

871.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Net neutrality would not suppress ISP competition in any way, shape, or form. Unless you count upset ISPs trying to take their ball and go home, like spoiled children. And yes, robust ISP competition would be awesome. But there are parts of
872.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Because the importance they place in the free market isn't genuine? It's only used when it benefits them. When it comes to employees, they want the furthest thing from a free market.
873.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Not if that's not the question before the court.
874.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"They ask for respect and equality of others but don't wish to give it to anyone who doesn't agree with their ideology." In this case, "doesn't agree with their ideology" actually means, "Believes tha
875.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
The resignation of Scott Pruitt.
876.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"There is a difference between exercising your freedom of speech and the social justice warrior crusading that the parent commenter is advocating." Tell us, what exactly is that difference? What's the difference between going
877.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"Maybe direct your ire at the people at the top who make these policies instead." These agents still choose to carry out those policies.
878.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Are we supposed to make them feel all happy and warm about violating our rights? They should feel miserable for what they do.
879.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"“For most people, TSA screenings are an unavoidable feature of flying,” but it is “squarely in the realm” of Congress to expand liability for abuses, Circuit Judge Cheryl Ann Krause wrote." How on earth is the TSA not already cov
880.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
I'm not sure I agree. React itself, sure. But the tools around a React project? Same with Node.
881.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Yeah, but those 6 people from one shift aren't all going to up and jump ship at the same time for shits and giggles. If they're doing that, then it's because they're feeling mistreated.
882.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
It does from the perspective of the workers.
883.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"If that were true then there would be no point in creating this regime." You're assuming the reason is always purely rational or economical. This is about control, pure and simple.
884.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Why that way? Why shouldn't the employers have to prove that they have a significant need before severely restricting employee freedom?
885.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Better yet, ask them to confirm that they don't track this stuff in the first place.
886.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Just because there shouldn't be an expectation of privacy doesn't mean we have to be happy when it's revealed that a private company is tracking this stuff en masse.
887.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Well, when you rip kids from parents seeking asylum, and then can't even get them back to their parents in a timely manner, yeah, people get upset.
888.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"But today it really has congregated on a relatively small set of best practices and the tools you see today are mostly the tools you would have seen two years ago." Has it? I'm pretty sure if I were to ask what those best pr
889.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Maybe if companies gave sufficient raises and promotions, and actually tried to retain talent, then we wouldn't have this culture where people keep having to switch jobs, and therefore always be looking out for what will get them the n
890.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"And if you repeatedly commit blunders on accident" Once or twice is an accident. "Repeatedly" demonstrates an unwillingness to change.
891.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
I really fail to see how your last paragraph has anything to do with the rest of the comment.
892.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"We don't have social skills like most people. That's fine. Why is that a bad thing? Those people wear lack of knowledge of logic and mathematics as though it were some badge to be proud of. Which is again, fine! Just don&#x2
893.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"You don't think (coordinated) harassment existed before social media?" Where on earth did I say that? You cannot deny, however, that it is far more prevalent. And that doesn't stop people from crying "censorship&qu
894.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"Blockhains are going to redistribute the wealth from the wealthy elite few to the masses." There is exactly nothing in blockchain that guarantees this will happen, or even makes it a likely outcome.
895.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Assuming I'm someone who wants to spend money on adult entertainment, why would I want to use a coin specifically for that as opposed to a general purpose coin? Same for someone who works in adult entertainment; why would I want a coin
896.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"And does blockchain offer an alternative tradeoff that we might like better?" Why do I care about limiting the options to blockchain?
897.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
If they were working on it, though, one would think they'd be delivering updates to show their progress.
898.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
I think that's the joke; that there are at least enough of those unethical people that they can make money off it.
899.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Can we offer an ICO for tokenized "taking things literally" jokes?
900.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
If that's the case, shouldn't you then align yourself with someone who does have a proven track record in doing these things?

More ›