s73v3r_

12 ms·

61.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Not in the legal sense, it doesn't
62.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
It's a solution if and only if the space allotted is enough for everyone on the plane to bring a decent sized suitcase. If not, then it's not a solution.
63.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Why do you want them to change gloves? "Also America is the only country I've flow through which still makes you take off your shoes. Fuck that nonsense." Agreed. That is the dumbest thing ever, especially because the elderly
64.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"It's ok if you need to leave your apartment so long as you can find another apartment nearby. No one has a right to live in a particular city, and scarce resources will go to those most willing to pay for them." I've al
65.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Build more housing yes, but removing caps on rent increases, especially if there is not more housing, is just going to exacerbate the problem.
66.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"No one NEEDS to have one. " So what? That doesn't change a single thing. All you are doing with this line of thinking is blaming the victim. The fault here is Facebook's and the attacker's. No one else's.
67.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Hedge funds have definitely not helped any of it.
68.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
But the way it was said, it implied that I should care about the burden on business. I don't. If you're saying I should be concerned about unintended consequences, then I can agree with that. But I'm not going to be upset tha
69.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"but you disliking the data they collect and/or their business model does not mean that everyone else will." I never said that, in fact I explicitly said the opposite. "I know full well the type of data Google and Facebo
70.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Why do I care if something like this is "burdensome" to businesses?
71.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Nobody is saying that they shouldn't be able to, rather that they should be informed as to what they're doing so they can actually make that decision. Without knowing what is happening, they cannot make an informed decision.
72.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"Didn't say no" is a very, very bad standard for consent.
73.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Exactly. There must always be an assumption that abuse happened.
74.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
I think most people here are more than ok with Arbitration being an option, but what people here hate are the clauses in the contracts which require arbitration that is paid for by the company, essentially removing your right to redress in
75.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"The relevant courts had repeatedly found that an offer of initial employment counted as consideration, but an offer of continued employment did not. " I could swear that the SCOTUS had a similar case and decided that continued em
76.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"You're literally comparing investing in a speculative instrument" Wrong. You're complaining about investments that give you absolutely no knowledge and no information about themselves, making you unable to make an infor
77.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
It would. Just because it's not explicitly looking for a "W" in the gender field doesn't mean it's not able to determine gender and discriminate based on that. The article and the discussion is all about how these t
78.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
But that's the problem that we've got now. Being able to have such a blanket clause encourages putting in all kinds of crap to see what sticks.
79.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
What about it? At the time it was signed, it was enforceable. So the lawyer would be fine.
80.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Because they absolutely do. A company that loses an employee likely isn't going to suffer. A person that loses or cannot get a job absolutely is. "Contracts only happen by mutual consent." That's not true in the least. W
81.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Yeah, no. You're completely ignoring the vast power imbalance at play here. And I care far, far, far more about the employees, than I do the employers.
82.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
One anecdote does not data make. The fact of the matter is, most people are not in a position to ask for any changes to the contract.
83.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Don't worry, soon enough all the companies we deal with will have made giving up your Constitutional rights a non-negotiable requirement for doing business with them.
84.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
You're not making a common sense argument. Your argument is literally that you're upset that you cannot buy into investments which give you absolutely no insight, information, or any kind of knowledge that would let you actually b
85.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
But you don't want it to select based on gender.
86.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
You start looking in different places for your applicants.
87.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"What is the evidence that the source data for this 'AI' is biased because the men it came from did not want to hire women?" Nobody is saying that the biases was caused because it was created by men who didn't want
88.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Someone had to decide on the training material. Note that saying that they had bias does not mean that they acted with malicious intent; most likely they didn't. That doesn't change the outcome, however.
89.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
More than that, though. Graduates of all-women colleges were also caught. If you're using school as a data point, that's extremely hard to sanitize.
90.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"Well the 13th amendment does deny you a right to sell yourself into slavery, so you're not substantiating your claim that these laws don't infringe on your right to privacy and free contract." I'm saying your compl

More ›