s73v3r

44 ms·

451.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Isn't the moratorium there to give the city time to come up with a plan? So by itself it wouldn't have an effect, but whatever the city comes up with should have the effect (whether it does or not depends on which crystal ball you
452.
by s73v3r 11y ago
1. Having a core team who's job it is to maintain the app and clean up the debt. 2. I seriously have to question that they absolutely need that pace. I don't buy it for a second that any of this is necessary or better than the alt
453.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Their needs are because they're sloppy. Having an overarching Core team who's job is to maintain the app and guide the architecture would cut down on what they need immensely.
454.
by s73v3r 11y ago
I doubt they have 400 people dedicated to the iOS app. I think it's more that 400 people happened to have touched the iOS app.
455.
by s73v3r 11y ago
I think they would quickly find out why there are the nuances carved out in the legal code. Writing laws for millions of people, let alone 300+ million, is insanely complex.
456.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Actually, given how many problems some Kickstarters have with manufacturing, having a company like Quirky that could come in, having experience with manufacturing, design, shipping, etc, could make many of those a much better experience.
457.
by s73v3r 11y ago
That's defending the practice.
458.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Except the rules are different for many federal areas. Transportation included.
459.
by s73v3r 11y ago
But you don't know if he simply made an honest mistake, or if he had a reason for keeping a gun with him.
460.
by s73v3r 11y ago
I'm hearing a bunch of excuses which are used to rationalize your bad behavior, but nothing based in reality.
461.
by s73v3r 11y ago
They couldn't accept it as payment. And it is that simple.
462.
by s73v3r 11y ago
This comment has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
463.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Except having the ads there is the cost for the content you're looking at.
464.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Marginal cost is irrelevant. Someone had to create the original thing in the first place.
465.
by s73v3r 11y ago
I don't see any flaw in the analogy.
466.
by s73v3r 11y ago
No, that is a cop out and a rationalization for why you feel you're entitled to stuff for free.
467.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Then come up with something better.
468.
by s73v3r 11y ago
"I hate this supposition that everyone should bend over backwards to allow people who make money in a certain way continue making money in that way. Am I the only one thinks that the user's experience should be more important than
469.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Only if someone in the destination currency is willing to trade that currency for Bitcoin.
470.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Just because someone says that Bitcoin is a currency doesn't make it one. Keep in mind that the Japanese Yen is a currency in Japan, but under US regulations, it is not. Likewise, the US Dollar is probably not a currency in Japan, but
471.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Depends on where the owner is. If you're in the US, you are supposed to declare them as an asset, and pay taxes on the sale of them.
472.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Bitcoin is not legal tender. The money in my checking account is.
473.
by s73v3r 11y ago
"Never ever use another offer as leverage, both the employer and the employee need to come to the table with good intentions." More often than not, employers won't give raises unless you do. "If an employee used another
474.
by s73v3r 11y ago
"Even a successful company needs good engineers. They don't fire people just because they're "not loyal"." Successful companies can still have a few crappy managers in them.
475.
by s73v3r 11y ago
"Then your salary is changed to $0.00." No, then you use your savings, which should be higher because you were paid more, and you go get another job, which should offer a higher starting salary because most starting salaries are b
476.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Are operating costs going up? While they have to hire more people, they don't have to replace people as often, and they don't have as many mistakes/errors, which can be expensive.
477.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Because part of the reason you might not want to take the job would be because of the people you'd have to work with.
478.
by s73v3r 11y ago
It's not really a great move, because anyone left who is decent is probably going to jump ship due to uncertainty in how the company is going. Simply keeping tabs on the people in the first place, and firing the non-performing ones is
479.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Is it? I mean, even the people who survive the layoffs are going to know that the company doesn't give a shit about them, and as such, they're not gonna care about the company. People who don't care about the company aren&#x2
480.
by s73v3r 11y ago
Because the governor wants to appear "tough on Obama," even if it means making things worse for his citizens.

More ›