Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
s73v3r
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
41 ms
·
421.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
There's a huge difference between criticism, and saying you wish that someone was retroactively aborted.
422.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
This is completely ignoring the fact that ads are how the content you enjoy gets paid for, and part of the social contract is that, since people won't pay, that the content will be paid for by ad views.
423.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
Then people won't use it. But knowing the internet, people will claim up and down that it doesn't have any value, while still using it. And then call the person greedy for wanting to feed their family.
424.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
I like to make those things too. I also like getting paid for doing something I like. And like I said, not everyone is lucky enough to where they can give away a lot of their labor.
425.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
"I don't know why you were downmodded but this is absolutely correct." Because nobody likes to talk about actually creating things. They feel like everything should be free, because costs of replication are low.
426.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
"Why someone feels entitled to my money, just because they facerolled their keyboard for a half an hour?" They're not the ones feeling entitled. You read their content. You used the product of their labor. Isn't the enti
427.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
People like to eat food and pay rent. Not everyone can afford to give away their hard work for free.
428.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
"There are (or should be) only two parties to a web request: the client and the server. Neither Apple, nor the State, nor Google, nor anyone else, is legitimately a party to my session" The ad is arguably part of the content, as i
429.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
"Just ask nicely and maybe I'll disable adblock or donate if I feel like the content was worth it." No you won't. You'll think, "Maybe I'll do it tomorrow," or, "You know, I didn't really en
430.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
"What precisely is the logical flaw?" That instead of having the people who are consuming and enjoying the content pay for it, that the entire economic system needs to be overhauled. I'm not opposed to UBI, but that is clearl
431.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
"We already pay for every byte of data that moves across the wire" You're paying for that byte to get from Point A to Point B. You haven't paid for the creation of that byte, though. "The right answer to the current
432.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
Automated payments are that great of an idea, because then I have no idea how much I'm actually spending. And you're crazy if you think most people will go in and look at their itemized "content bill" unless they find a
433.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
Snorkeling and psychotropic drugs are two completely different things.
434.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
Probably that there's a difference between uBlock and uBlock Origin.
435.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
If it's in a home directory, then the stuff installed is really only usable by that person. I can see some instances where that would be desirable, but I would prefer that the stuff I install is usable by the whole system, even though
436.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
Again, no it's not. Unless you just want to ignore everything about where you're making that directory.
437.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
They want /usr/local to be owned by you.
438.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
"But Apple can't be trusted" You haven't given a reason why. And no, the existence of iOS is not a reason.
439.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
No, it's not. Mainly because it's not just "adding a directory"
440.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
Keep in mind that you can re-enable SIP right after you create the directory, if you had to create it at all.
441.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
OS X has always provided a fine Unix experience for me.
442.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
Why? Does the value they contribute to the business change that much simply because they can now live cheaper?
443.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
"This "must be colocated" mind-set is lose-lose no matter which way you cut it." Is it? Are they that starved for talent? You turned it down, but was it that hard for them to find another?
444.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
No, the context is insane rent prices. That doesn't translate to losing money. Several people have stated that the difference in salary is making up for it, to where they have as much after rent, after tax income or more than in other
445.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
It's an entirely fair way of looking at it. Just because other developers live in cheaper areas of the country doesn't change how much value a good developer is bringing to your business.
446.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
There still is quite a few hurdles to switching states, not the least of which is having the money to do so, and the ability to find a job and housing in the new state. Usually those that are the most affected by bad policy are the least ab
447.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
It is entirely about AirBnB's UX. Going to the rental is the largest part of their UX. If that's a bad experience, why would anyone want to try it again.
448.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
Doesn't sound like it, otherwise they'd prioritize customer service, and we wouldn't be heading as many of these stories.
449.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
I, for one, am absolutely sick and tired of companies thinking it's "disruptive" to ignore the law. Why do they think they're so special?
450.
▲
by
s73v3r
11y ago
"The heart of your argument is that there is some clear distinction between residential and commercial which doesn't actually exist. Residential properties have always been used for profit - its called an apartment." That
More ›