s17n

49 ms·

541.
by s17n 8y ago
The extra $300 is what you pay for going with a reputable brand, because unlike Marriott, you don't have the time to figure out which off-brand mattresses are crap and which aren't.
542.
by s17n 8y ago
So to a first order approximation, 1% of people are involved in the drug business. Not a huge number.
543.
by s17n 8y ago
tl;dr: > Due to a variety of technical and organizational issues, we will be sunsetting React Native and putting all of our efforts into making native amazing.
544.
by s17n 8y ago
It's because fashion brands don't want to let Amazon sell their products. Lax counterfeit enforcement is Amazon saying "you can do this the easy way or the hard way." Kind of like how Youtube couldn't figure out h
545.
by s17n 8y ago
It's probably on the front page because a lot of people are deciding between PyTorch or Tensorflow for their company's production ML pipeline, and this is an article about making exactly that decision. Even if they didn't pr
546.
by s17n 8y ago
Sounds like they were working in catering for events, which has traditionally been a job you can show up and get with no skill (unlike sommelier which is highly skilled).
547.
by s17n 8y ago
IE won because it was better than Netscape, Firefox won because it was better than IE, Chrome won because it was better than Firefox. As far as I can tell the whole history of browser market share is just one long example of the market wor
548.
Is collected self-driving data useless after GDPR?(blog.understand.ai)
1 points by s17n 8y ago|0 comments
549.
by s17n 8y ago
It's clearly there to demonstrate the pipe support...
550.
by s17n 8y ago
"Nobody lives there anymore, it's too crowded"
551.
by s17n 8y ago
> How is that differentiating yourself? Cause nobody else does it.
552.
by s17n 8y ago
Without coercion / oppression / bad stuff happening, few men would be able to afford it.
553.
by s17n 8y ago
Great customer service but ruthless with their suppliers. The author here falls into the latter camp.
554.
by s17n 8y ago
Clickbait title, should be something like "What Windows 95 did right" or "Product design lessons from Windows 95". Also, the article is crap.
555.
by s17n 8y ago
The whole concept that people have ownership of any information about themselves is new. If I take a picture of my friend Bob, or write an article about him, and upload it to your website, you now have an obligation to Bob.
556.
by s17n 8y ago
> Companies complaining about GDPR goes into the same category as companies complaining about minimum wage for me. It's more like complaining about any other compliance cost. Consultancies are making probably billions of dollars of
557.
by s17n 8y ago
Often, the nuances of the real world defy simple syllogistic reasoning. This isn't one of those times.
558.
by s17n 8y ago
The point is that since similar statements could be constructed about anything ("murder isn't wrong, it's the job of police to prevent me from killing people"), it's a dumb argument, regardless of how you feel about
559.
by s17n 8y ago
That's like saying "stealing isn't morally wrong - inventory control is retailers' responsibility and therefore it's their job to reduce loss".
560.
by s17n 8y ago
Presumably he feels that Zuck is reneging on his verbal agreements made during the acquisition process. Speaking out publicly is the appropriate recourse.
561.
by s17n 8y ago
It's good to discuss things upfront but I almost always realize stuff while I'm implementing that I hadn't completely forseen.
562.
by s17n 8y ago
Code review should be informal and conversational, these guidelines are the opposite of that. I'd say the real problem here is people not having the rapport neccesary for a real conversation.
563.
by s17n 8y ago
Exactly
564.
by s17n 8y ago
No, that's the job of whoever is making the hiring decision. The interviewer is providing signal for that person / people.
565.
by s17n 8y ago
I'm not there to figure out how good the candidate is at the things they claim to be good at. I'm there to figure out how good they are at the things the company wants them to be good at. (Not trying to claim that I'm actual
566.
by s17n 8y ago
I think that reading the resume is probably appropriate for the person making the hiring decision but for the interviewer, it's clearly a bad idea.
567.
by s17n 8y ago
I am skeptical that standardized rubrics can help but my approach is more effective and easier anyway, at least for things you can avoid knowing. Doesn't help with race or gender bias though unfortunately.
568.
by s17n 8y ago
I think that would probably already happen if it weren't for the fact that there are more high paying jobs then there are MIT/Stanford/etc grads.
569.
by s17n 8y ago
Ask a technical question or two and assess the candidate based on their reply.
570.
by s17n 8y ago
I'm not making a hiring decision, I'm just an interviewer.

More ›