Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ryeguy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ryeguy
5y ago
This doesn't answer the question being asked.
32.
▲
by
ryeguy
6y ago
How do RFCs and ADRs play together? Would you consider a finalized RFC (all comments/concerns addressed in some way) to be an ADR?
33.
▲
by
ryeguy
6y ago
It's pretty well established that calories alone, not macronutrient composition, are what is responsible for weight loss: https://examine.com/nutrition/what-should-you-eat-for-weight... . There are plenty of studie
34.
▲
by
ryeguy
6y ago
> This is a straw man, because the point that is trying to be refused is that "insulin is bad", not "carbs are bad". I don't see how this is a strawman. Click through to the source article, that bullet point in p
35.
▲
by
ryeguy
6y ago
Calorie count _is_ the key. This is incredibly well established in studies. Weight loss does not occur without caloric deficit, no matter what you eat. Likewise, weight loss will occur in caloric deficit even when eating what people would c
36.
▲
by
ryeguy
6y ago
Insulin does not lead to increased weight gain. If this approach does work, it's because it's a roundabout way of eating lower calorie foods and thus lowering daily caloric intake.
37.
▲
by
ryeguy
6y ago
Yes really. Keto still follows calories in/out. Low carb diets are just a way of restricting calories without counting them. People naturally restrict calories when eating low carb -- this is the sole reason it works. You can eat twink
38.
▲
by
ryeguy
6y ago
Insulin is not required for fat storage. Insulin spikes do not create energy out of nowhere and don't suddenly make the same number of input calories multiply. Also, insulin spikes are nearly unpredictable anyway. Carbs aren't nec
39.
▲
by
ryeguy
6y ago
Nothing is wrong with this picture. Your thought process boils down to "OP should be making enough money at their day job, why would they try to make more?" which is ridiculous.
40.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
I agree you should do this from the user's perspective, but what about when a message handler (which is already async and not blocking the user) needs to call into an api? You could rewrite it to use queues for the request and response
41.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
Why not use spot fleets to solve this? You can specify multiple acceptable instance types.
42.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
As you gain more experience in software development, you'll look back at this post and laugh.
43.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
Not satire, just hacker news.
44.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
I'm not sure where you're getting that idea. Are you thinking the target audience of this content is only for people developing JVM languages? It's not, it's how the vm and compiler work at a low level and optimize your
45.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
Zeromq is just a bit of sugar on top of tcp sockets. It isn't a message queue or anything close. You would be wasting a ton of time reimplementing a lot of basic features like retries, persistence, service discovery, dead letter queues
46.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
Pulsar wouldn't be the thing that stores the view, it would be the canonical data store used to rebuild the views. The idea is you have an event sourced view and can rebuilt it at any time by resetting the stream pointer to the beginni
47.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
> micro-aggressions We're adults here, can we please not talk like tumblr blog posters?
48.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
Kafka can scale and distribute individual streams across the cluster. That is, the entire "database" is distributed across nodes. With postgres, your unit of scalability is the entire database. You can't natively have some ta
49.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
It's much easier to scale kafka than a relational db. There's also an advantage to offloading the read load to another system instead of hitting the db for that, too.
50.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
Doesn't that mean you need to bubble up every dependency up the stack? Like if function a calls b which calls c which calls d, and d needs a new dependency, wouldn't that involve modifying a, b, and c's function signatures an
51.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
I'm confused by what you mean. DI doesn't introduce any more dependencies compared to a non-DI approach (like hardcoding dependencies via module import or static methods), so how does it change the unit of work? DI doesn't ad
52.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
The "computer language benchmarks game" does not support this. Erlang is more than 2x faster than Ruby in cpu intensive tasks across their benchmarks.
53.
▲
by
ryeguy
7y ago
The vast majority of people using a package manager in the PHP ecosystem are using composer. It makes sense to call it "the" package manager.
54.
▲
by
ryeguy
8y ago
No it doesn't. All you have to do is search <language> <package> and you get relevant results. Look through your library list, it's pretty common for the names to only make sense in context.
55.
▲
by
ryeguy
8y ago
Any language that doesn't have generics, including C and Go, have to work around that limitation. In C, people get around this by using void* (equivalent to using interface{} in Go) or code generation via macros. I'd flip what you
56.
▲
by
ryeguy
8y ago
But like I said, Go doesn't have an answer for generics. So the complexity just lives in userland code instead of the language itself. The problem and complexity doesn't go away.
57.
▲
by
ryeguy
8y ago
Coincidentally, here's Rust's getting started workflow: - Install Rust - Install VSCode + Rust plugin - Start working
58.
▲
by
ryeguy
8y ago
I really don't get the people opposed to generics. Is there actually a cross between experienced developers who have come from languages that have generics and understand them, yet don't want them in go? If so, why, and what do th
59.
▲
by
ryeguy
8y ago
It's an exception, not a crash.
60.
▲
by
ryeguy
8y ago
But I want things.
More ›