ryao

46 ms·

571.
by ryao 2y ago
If you read the original commit comment, userspace software needs to opt into this: https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds... If it is not reported for people to know about it,
572.
by ryao 2y ago
That is not what pyfon was suggesting. He was suggesting publishing binaries instead of source code.
573.
by ryao 2y ago
The license does not necessarily need to be in the files. It could be a project level license in LICENSE, which is what the author here did.
574.
by ryao 2y ago
To be fair, Spegel changed the copyright notice in 2024. It used to say someone else. That said, Microsoft is definitely missing the notice.
575.
by ryao 2y ago
He had a top level license file that presumably applies to all files. He would not be the first to do that and will not be the last. That said, if Microsoft had forked before the LICENSE was added or stated somewhere, they were reusing all-
576.
by ryao 2y ago
I just tried this on my desktop's monitor, which unlike my iPad Pro that was factory calibrated, has never been calibrated as far as I know. By round 11, the colors were nearly imperceptible, although I managed to answer 4 more correct
577.
by ryao 2y ago
OpenZFS has many files with multiple copyright lines in them.
578.
by ryao 2y ago
Blobs violate clause 2 of the Open Source Definition: https://opensource.org/osd We are no longer talking about open source software if you distribute blobs in place of source code.
579.
by ryao 2y ago
It is a fairly standard practice in at least some open source communities to add copyright notices to files that people have changed significantly, although there is no well defined minimum threshold for how much permits them to add a copyr
580.
by ryao 2y ago
The commit histories for the LICENSE files in the two repositories are rather interesting. The original author placed a single copyright notice in that file. Microsoft on the other hand published it with their copyright notice and a Apache
581.
by ryao 2y ago
The AGPL doesn't require them to contribute back. It only requires them to provide the code to end users upon request. No license as far as I know requires people to contribute back. In many cases, project maintainers would not want th
582.
by ryao 2y ago
I initially was going to say: Failing to abide by the MIT license is copyright infringement. My advice is to contact these guys: https://softwarefreedom.org/ They likely can file a cease and desist on your behalf. However,
583.
by ryao 2y ago
They are already offering 6-day certificates: https://letsencrypt.org/2025/01/16/6-day-and-ip-certs/
584.
by ryao 2y ago
I tried filing an issue against the chromium project for DANE support a year or two ago and they closed the issue with a nonsense reason.
585.
by ryao 2y ago
I deploy DNSSEC on all domains I administer.
586.
by ryao 2y ago
> Must-staple has almost zero adoption. The engineering cost of supporting it for a feature that is nearly unused just isn’t there. > We did consider it. That is unfortunate. I just deployed a web server the other day and was thrilled
587.
by ryao 2y ago
This seems to be a test of the color accuracy of a display. I got 17/20 and the 3 I got wrong were the last 3. I did this on my iPad Pro. For the last ones, they all looked the same to me.
588.
by ryao 2y ago
The first path would be the most interesting, especially if it can be automated.
589.
by ryao 2y ago
I am #4 here: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/graphs/contributors I would have preferred to see what would have been generated without my guidance, but since you asked: * Explanations of how each sub-component
590.
by ryao 2y ago
My comment gave constructive feedback. Yours did not.
591.
by ryao 2y ago
Perfect forward secrecy means harvest now, decrypt later does not apply to signature algorithms when ephemeral keys are used and TLSv1.3 mandates ephemeral keys. If the ephemeral keys are cracked, that would be the fault of the key agreemen
592.
by ryao 2y ago
The pivot is occurring on both key agreement and signatures. Hybrid schemes currently only exist for key agreement. Perfect forward secrecy means that as long as the key agreement schemes are secure against Shor’s algorithm, we can afford t
593.
by ryao 2y ago
That seems like a mistake, since PQAs are an objective downgrade from ECC in everything except for immunity to Shor’s algorithm. It is not clear that machines with the tens of millions of qubits needed to run Shor’s algorithm will be constr
594.
by ryao 2y ago
I would find this more interesting if it made tutorials out if the Linux, LLVM, OpenZFS and FreeBSD codebases.
595.
by ryao 2y ago
That is true. I was imagining the AWS egress costs at my own work where things are going to so many places with latency requirements that the idea of sending hard drives is simply not feasible, even with infinite money and pretending the ha
596.
by ryao 2y ago
I suspect that is the result of this: https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/134u0mq/cloudflare_c... They got rid of all of the “underperforming” sales people and hired new ones. That nightmare is the r
597.
by ryao 2y ago
The other guy was also comparing them based on transfer cost. Given that 1TB can be divided across billions of locations, shipping physical drives is not a feasible alternative to transit at Amazon in general.
598.
by ryao 2y ago
The two are not comparable. The 1TB of transit at Amazon can be subdivided over many recipients, while the solid state drive is empty and only can be sent to one. That said, I agree that transit costs are too high.
599.
by ryao 2y ago
It shows the two different file sizes.
600.
by ryao 2y ago
The same C example compiled in C++23 mode, https://godbolt.org/z/MWa7qqrK7 Everyone knows this. The original comment was saying not to do this (even in C++) and use C++ classes instead. I was making the point tha

More ›