Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ryanlol
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
74 ms
·
811.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
It’s only adults left on IRC these days, all the script kiddie chats happen on Discord.
812.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Wouldn’t Qubes be more software engineering than CS?
813.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
>Please explain why you think this. Because without the secondary market there’d be no incentive for anyone to give up a domain. At least now the domains actually end up with parties willing to pay a fair price for them.
814.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Oh fuck off, that’s a regular topic on HN (as is the plight of the Uyghurs). You can operate the search yourself and confirm this. What are you hinting at anyway? Just spit it out. >I’m not sure if that was intentional or not, but your c
815.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
It’d be cool if you included a disclosure when you advertise your cryptocurrency scheme.
816.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
The second hand market already solved this, why does Verisign need to be the one doing this?
817.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
The redistribution is happening every day, every day people are buying land-grab era domains they can extract value from.
818.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Okay so the complaint is essentially “this doesn’t feel fair!”. I guess this really does come down to envy, just as another commenter pointed out. >but harms the end consumer It doesn’t though, without the second hand market someone woul
819.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
That’d match the current policy of “It’s ok for US to break any foreign laws”
820.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Why do anything? It’s well known that US intelligence hacks Chinese (and European!) companies, why escalate with indictments? The Chinese are perfectly capable of namedropping NSA employees too.
821.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Essentially all the data contained in the Equifax breach has been for sale a long time before this breach, the other breached entities stayed quiet so people unfamiliar with the business tend to just assume that Equifax is to blame for ever
822.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Go to your profile, set “showdead” to yes.
823.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
>You don't see foreign governments identifying individual NSA employees when the NSA hacks into something... See my mysteriously flagged comment demonstrating exactly this https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2229076
824.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Yeaaah, it’s not like the US doesn’t do this https://github.com/649/EQGRP-TrickOrTreat/tree/master/pitchi... It’s ridiculous how many people here seem to think China is somehow special as far as this sor
825.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Whats legitimate use? If I owned “doctor.com” or “lawyer.com” and used that for my unrelated low effort personal website, would that be better for everyone than a domain squatter who’s willing to sell the domain to someone who’s actually go
826.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Is domain distribution patently unbalanced for society as a whole? What does that even mean? Should everyone be able to get a short dictionary word .com domain?
827.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Of course ticket scalping is fine, many venues go out of their way to enable it. I’ve often benefited from the scalpers by being able to buy last minute tickets. Same goes for domain squatters. You think squatting is bad? Ok. What if my low
828.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
> The "domain squatting" meme is intellectually dishonest and based on envy Yup. Still waiting to hear a more nuanced explanation of the supposed “problem” than this.
829.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Why is it a problem that some domains cost $100,000 or more?
830.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
That doesn’t really explain the implementation. How would you know that two domains are owned by the same person without completely revamping the role of registrars?
831.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Why is it such a big problem that you have to pay more than $7 for a single word .com? Is it just that it feels unfair to you for someone to be profiting like this? I’ve been more than happy to buy domains from these squatters, they’re usua
832.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
But that’s just not true.
833.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
>The domain squatting problem is so bad How is the domain squatting problem so bad ? You’ll need to expand on this further.
834.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
> Would it be an undue burden to require people like you to put up a page saying, "This is my personal domain which I use primarily for email."? Yes, this is a terrible idea. > Surely you can imagine a set of rules that shut
835.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Obscure international agricultural export dispute? I don’t know about you, but that sounds very HN to me. I’m not sure if that was intentional or not, but your choice of words (internal) seems to hint at why you might not want to see this d
836.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
> unless you do some very DMCA illegal firmware patching That seems very risky given the regular unannounced firmware audits by the DMCA police.
837.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
> Then if a driver has exceeded the 130kph he will invariably be assigned a higher liability for consequences of the accident since the driver accepted the increased risk for accidents by operating the vehicle at a speed above the adviso
838.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
It’s interesting, certainly doesn’t fall into the “ If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.”-category. Why would this not be relevant for HN?
839.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Do they? It’s pretty pointless to speculate about something so easily verifiable.
840.
▲
by
ryanlol
7y ago
Sketchy parsers operating on untrusted, unstructured log data. fail2ban is worse than useless.
More ›