Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ryanlol
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
35 ms
·
331.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
This really doesn’t add up. Who was performing these hard passport checks? An airline employee? Where was your flight originating from/going to?
332.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
> Also the worst of all countries has doubtlessly been the UK UK is pay to play, for a reasonable amount (600GBP at LGW and ~1k at LHR IIRC) of money you can be the first to exit your plane and be taken through the private jet terminal w
333.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
You can travel without any ID just fine, evidence of EU (or EEA?) citizenship is sufficient.
334.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
I fly around europe on almost a weekly basis to and from a wide variety of airports. My ID has never been checked before security. I think maybe you’re confusing the checkin where you might show your passport with an ID check? You can compl
335.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
Freenode didn’t even exist 20 years ago
336.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
This wasn’t even remotely similar. Those EU countries didn’t allow the plane into their airspace, encouraging it to land in a third country to refuel. Belarus called in a fake bomb threat and used their fighter jets to force a passenger fli
337.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
> A slight diplomatic difference in tactics to achieve the same effect A massive difference in tactics, these two are incomparable. Just like denying someone entry at the border is not the same as arresting them and collecting rent from
338.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
Yeah, this case is. The Morales case wasn’t.
339.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
Not really, that plane was forced to land by not allowing it enter certain airspace. Very different from having fighter jets intercept and force a plane to land. Shameful? Maybe. Hijacking? No.
340.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
By whom? Googling that term shows that it’s not widely used and brings up cars like aston martin vantage and bentley continental gt, which are certainly luxurious and could reasonably (the bentley less so) be described as sports cars. Can y
341.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
Look, I think we both can agree that nobody would describe a mclaren s720 with bucket seats as luxurious. It’s a sports car. These cars are luxuries, but it doesn’t make sense to refer them to as luxury cars unless they’re actually luxuriou
342.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
Yeah, the electric lotus elise is totally a luxury car.
343.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
Some luxury cars are fast, not all fast cars are luxury cars.
344.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
The Roadster does not exist. Model S competes with low end german cars when it comes to luxury, but is priced on the same level with S-class.
345.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
How does Maker for example not create any value? They’ve built a decentralized USD-pegged token, how is that not worth something?
346.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
This is not correct. But if you are facing federal charges you probably do not want to do that.
347.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
This does not use a full /64. > If you could scan 1 million IP addresses a second on a /64 (which is absurd) Not at all, I regularly scan the internet at well over 20Mpps.
348.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
Compared to just deploying totp normally as a PAM module this is a horrible idea. Much harder to ratelimit, much cheaper for the attacker to bruteforce codes. It’s neat for sure, but not a good defense.
349.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
>Who owns the United States? This is a legal entity that owns itself. >Who owns Linux? Linux Mark Institute owns the trademark, contributors own the copyright to their code. This is not a complicated question.
350.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
>you mean our donated compute and time that we don't get paid for is costing you millions? how?? Sounds like you forgot about the very expensive conference freenode staff organized with rasengans money
351.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
Who owns it then?
352.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
> - Andrew Lee didn't recognise tomaw as christel's successor (and maybe tried to appoint his own choice of successor) Is this really correct? As far as I understand tomaw tried to claw back freenode assets from rasengan which
353.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
Is it though? It seems that this was all initiated by freenode staff trying to walk back on the deal Christel made with rasengan, forcing his hand.
354.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
NYSE does the same when there are big drops. If there was a 20% intraday drop in SPY they’d halt trading for the rest of the day. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trading_curb
355.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
So what’s the point of restricting ransomware payments then? Only organizations that can’t hack it in the modern economy will be affected anyway.
356.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
This is strictly not true, Tether makes trades on exchanges in order to maintain the peg.
357.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
As long as Tether maintains the peg on exchanges you can cash out, this is no different than cashing out directly via Tether
358.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
The TOS is pretty meaningless given current exchange volumes. If you somehow ended up with billions of dollars in tether you’d have no difficulty cashing it out to usd.
359.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
Oh nonsense, that was well established to be an edit of the binary. It’s obvious the GRU didn’t have the source code. The idea that this was an example of the GRU working with criminal hackers is plainly ridiculous. https://blog.
360.
▲
by
ryanlol
5y ago
> Following that logic, any obvious ponzi / pyramid scheme is credible and trustworthy until it demonstrably collapses? Credible and trustworthy? Of course not! Slightly more credible than a napkin with “100% cash” written on it? Of
More ›