> Following that logic, any obvious ponzi / pyramid scheme is credible and trustworthy until it demonstrably collapses? Credible and trustworthy? Of course not

> Following that logic, any obvious ponzi / pyramid scheme is credible and trustworthy until it demonstrably collapses? Credible and trustworthy? Of course not! Slightly more credible than a napkin with “100% cash” written on it? Of course. > You say tether is "maintaining" the peg but that information comes... from them That information comes from the exchanges where tether is traded. >You won't see that they are not even close to solvent until a bank run occurs Nobody is disputing this