Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ryankrage77
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
the 'no randomness = no free will' argument is pretty common, but how does randomness ensure free will? It's still something out of our control, just it can't be predicited. Why is it any better to be a random automaton
32.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
Microsoft's accouncement: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/microsoft365insider... Word has defaulted to saving in OneDrive (if you turn on autosave and you're signed into an MS account) for years now,
33.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
Lots of comments about the questionable choices of this person regarding disclosing all this information. To add to the pile, they got a friend fired from McDonalds, and don't seem particularly bothered about it... https://b
34.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
Apple and Google insist their walled gardens are needed for user safety and security, but they can't even catch popular apps violating their own policies. It casts (even more) doubt on their ability to screen for malware, phishing, etc
35.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
agreed, I don't think the drive is fake, they're just that bad. Only SSD I've ever had fail spontaneously on me (the one other SSD failiure was my fault for accidentally unplugging it during a firmware update).
36.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
I do wonder what these people's thought process is, to want to make gay marriage illegal. I grew up in a Christian household, and definitely used to be homophobic, as a sort of default. But once I was old enough to think for myself (I
37.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
Dismantling the moon would disrupt the Earth's orbit, so the most likely version of this scenario is not beneficial/benign (e.g, grey goo scenario), so you need to factor in the chance that you'll be dissasembled before you s
38.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
> maximum of one year or more If the max is one year, it can't be more?
39.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
I don't remember learning to read, or a time in my life where I couldn't read at least a bit. As best I can figure I began reading before my episodic memory fully developed. I do wonder how I managed to learn anything just by read
40.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
Huh, just realised my team did this organically without realising it. People were often hesitant to ask questions they perceived as 'dumb' in the group chat, and definitely unwilling to post anything seen as complaining/moani
41.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
I think it's two schools of thought, end product vs process. It seems a lot of people who like AI only care about getting the end product, and don't care how it was made. On the other hand, some people are invested in how somethin
42.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
I think a lot of these issues could be worked around by having the working state backed up after each step (e.g, make a git commit or similar). The LLM should not have any information about this backup process in its context or access to it
43.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
To a user, many modern UI's are unpredictable and unreliable anyway. "I've always done it this way, but it's not working...".
44.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
I think AGI, if possible, will require a architecture that runs continuously and 'experiences' time passing, to better 'understand' cause-and-effect. Current LLMs predict a token, have all current tokens fed back in, the
45.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
That's caused by the way the brain 'edits out' motion that occurs during saccade eye movements. If the second hand ticks at the same time as your eyes are panning toward it, you won't see the tick happening. Once the sac
46.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
> All of my original thoughts feel like early drafts of better, more complete thoughts that simply haven’t yet formed inside an LLM I would like access to whatever LLM the author is using, because I cannot relate to this at all. Nearly a
47.
▲
by
ryankrage77
1y ago
I'd argue that's a pretty good test for an LLM - can it overcome the red herrings and get at the actual problem?
48.
▲
by
ryankrage77
2y ago
> "resist the temptation to get better ratings from gullible humans by hallucinating citations or faking task completion" Everything this from this point on is pure fiction. An LLM can't get tempted or resist temptations,
49.
▲
by
ryankrage77
2y ago
Beauty of scale. Saving ten milliseconds a hundred times is just a second. But do it a billion times and you've shaved off ~4 months.
50.
▲
by
ryankrage77
2y ago
This has failed me. I was mugged while black out drunk, and they succesfully unlocked my phone, unlocked my banking app, etc, despite me having the eye contact feature enabled.
51.
▲
by
ryankrage77
2y ago
Justine Tunney, https://github.com/jart
52.
▲
by
ryankrage77
2y ago
GPT-4 got it right first try for me, with a slightly modified prompt: > Here's a simple logic puzzle: You walk up to a glass door. It has 'push' written on it in mirror writing. What should you do and why? > ChatGPT sai
53.
▲
by
ryankrage77
2y ago
Probably not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers only lists up to a Millinillion, or 10^3003. You can compound them, but it kinda defeats the point. A googol is too small, and a googolplex is too la
54.
▲
by
ryankrage77
2y ago
I assume this is satire, because nobody would play a game with those requirements.
55.
▲
by
ryankrage77
2y ago
The premise reminds of discussions of computing in Ra. https://qntm.org/aum > "Don't talk about the future," Vidyasagar says. > "What? Why not?" > "Look at this computer," Vidyasa
56.
▲
by
ryankrage77
2y ago
https://wigle.net/stats#ssidstats thought it disagrees with OP's observations
57.
▲
by
ryankrage77
2y ago
Difficult to find by search on the app store - 'tik', 'tik game' (and with the exclamation mark appended) didn't return it, but 'tik! haptic' did.
58.
▲
by
ryankrage77
2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_illusion
59.
▲
by
ryankrage77
2y ago
> Apple reportedly believes that the exposure the iOS 18 integration is giving OpenAI is “of equal or greater value” than cash. So it's not just gig workers who get offered exposure to pay the bills.
60.
▲
by
ryankrage77
2y ago
I've been recieving these for 5-6 years now. Last I checked, they haven't deleted my stuff, which is pretty nice of them.
More ›