6 ms·
Probably not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers only lists up to a Millinillion, or 10^3
by ryankrage77 2y ago
Probably not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers only lists up to a Millinillion, or 10^3003. You can compound them, but it kinda defeats the point.
A googol is too small, and a googolplex is too large.
- Arcorann 2y agoIf you check the section "Extensions of the standard dictionary numbers" on the page you linked, there's a system for naming arbitrarily large numbers as -illions. The prime here is approx. 8.82 * 10^41024319, and 10^41024319 is the 13674772nd -illion (short scale), so it would begin eight tredecilliquattuorseptuagintasescentilliduoseptuagintaseptingentillion.
- jamiek88 2y agoI think google just got fined that by Russia.
- o11c 2y agoThe whole point of the extensible system is that you can, in fact, extend it as much as you need. ... I just threw this into my zillion-ifier program and ... huh, it took 12 hours even with the GMP version, though I'll admit I didn't really optimize it ... the output is about a gigabyte of text eight tredecilliquattuorseptuagintasescentilliduoseptuagintaseptingentillion, eight hundred sixteen tredecilliquattuorseptuagintasescentilliunseptuagintaseptingentillion, nine hundred forty three tredecilliquattuorseptuagintasescentilliseptuagintaseptingentillion, two hundred seventy five tredecilliquattuorseptuagintasescentillinovensexagintaseptingentillion, thirty eight tredecilliquattuorseptuagintasescentillioctosexagintaseptingentillion, ...