ryanklee

11 ms·

91.
Cybertruck Delivers Failure(youtube.com)
5 points by ryanklee 3y ago|0 comments
92.
by ryanklee 3y ago
This is Huggingface. Given their audience, it'd be incredibly weird of them to not be specific.
93.
by ryanklee 3y ago
It is common, standard usage precisely in this context.
94.
by ryanklee 3y ago
It's absolutely straightforward to uphold Democratic principles over Fascistic enterprises. People who get this wrong are simply wrong, and it's likely emotional and psychological forces that got them there, not rational, historio
95.
by ryanklee 3y ago
The number of people in this comment section that are getting hung up on the word recall without looking into established usage and legal definitions of the word is nuts.
96.
by ryanklee 3y ago
The justification isn't that people are morons, it's that the same word can have different meanings on different contexts.
97.
by ryanklee 3y ago
It's not working. They are having the time of their lives right now.
98.
by ryanklee 3y ago
When you make promises and don't keep them while taking people's money on the back of those promises, that's fraud. When you do it for almost 10 years, that's almost 10 years of fraud.
99.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Everyone will eventually agree on this point, except for alt right weirdos.
100.
by ryanklee 3y ago
It reflects Musk's own bias. If he actually gave a shit about competence and quality, Teslas would be more functional outside California. But he doesn't and won't, so until he crawls into a hole somewhere and disappears, Tesl
101.
by ryanklee 3y ago
It's the court's job to argue with idiots. Saves the rest of us some time and grief.
102.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Seems like that's happening with mixture of experts already. Not sure you are presenting an inherent LLM barrier.
103.
by ryanklee 3y ago
What you will notice is that in every comment section where an LLM can be easily accused of "just being a token predictor" dozens of people will make the accusation like it's just the best accusation since sliced bread. But i
104.
by ryanklee 3y ago
How well does this handle tables and text embedded in images?
105.
by ryanklee 3y ago
This is a very narrow view of how LLMs can interact to improve inference accuracy. Different LLMs have different capabilities. They can be used in coordination to improve results. Your objections seem to rely on a restricted view that says
106.
by ryanklee 3y ago
AIs can double check. Agent to agent confirmation and validation is a thing. In any case, the point is that we have learned techniques to compensate for human fallibility. We will learn techniques to compensate for gen AI fallibility, as we
107.
by ryanklee 3y ago
They do fit this definition. One result of the rise of generative AI is exposing just how severely and commonly people misperceive their own capabilities and the functioning of their cognitive powers.
108.
by ryanklee 3y ago
A human cannot do this self-sufficiently. This is why we work so hard to implement risk mitigation measures and checks and balances on changes.
109.
by ryanklee 3y ago
It's an incorrect judgement that's entirely ignorant of the entire field of linguistics. People should have fewer opinions of this type as they are founded on very wrong ideas of how language works. In short, it is not valuable at
110.
by ryanklee 3y ago
This is a ridiculous, arbitrary judgment that has nothing to do with anything even remotely related to this post. This type of pedantry is low-brow and annoying.
111.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Again, if there is no way to distinguish a conversation with an AI with a conversation with a human, then there's no barrier. I don't see how what you are saying holds any water in that scenario.
112.
by ryanklee 3y ago
85 hours in the context of a game which is supposed to exist on a cosmic scale is not much.
113.
by ryanklee 3y ago
This is just hand waving. When people can talk to AI in the same way as they speak to people, then there is no barrier.
114.
by ryanklee 3y ago
You can talk through your earbud.
115.
by ryanklee 3y ago
These don't seem like real issues to me. They are the exact same issues you have when you are talking to humans. And the way we solve that issue with humans is that we only have conversations around other humans that we are comfortable
116.
by ryanklee 3y ago
The only reason people don't like talking to computers in public is that it's distinguishable in an awkward way from talking to humans in public. That's not going to be an issue for much longer. ChatGPT voice mode is about 99
117.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Without more technical insight (which you do not have), that's a total non sequitur.
118.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I would not be opposed to putting those who do the promotional work on the hook for giving back a percentage of earnings to compensate victims. I do think, however, that the principle would have to be applied more generally and pertain to m
119.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I'm very confused by the juxtaposition of your top-level comment and this one. They seem to be saying exactly opposite things.
120.
by ryanklee 3y ago
But then this is a principle, and it's got nothing to do with Larry David et al. Further, it has nothing to do with the FTX outcome, since the principle is not about particular outcomes, but general risks. Given that, it makes no sense

More ›