ryanklee

26 ms·

301.
by ryanklee 3y ago
People who suffer from chronic depression do so without regard to circumstance. It's a mental plague that follows one wherever they go, whatever they do. It has nothing do with reactions to anything. There's nothing reasonable abo
302.
by ryanklee 3y ago
There are people making applications based on LLMs. You may quibble with the term LLM Developer, but to sneer or roll your eyes at it as if it were prima facie inaccurate or laughable is unjustified.
303.
by ryanklee 3y ago
The amount of get-off-my-lawn grognardness that LLM activity inspires is really ridiculous. I really would ask you to take a second look at the spirit of your comment and think carefully about how much you really understand about the work b
304.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Apologies for misunderstanding the intention of your comment. That does make sense.
305.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Thanks. All is well!
306.
by ryanklee 3y ago
How is it satire to be excited and interested in how to use compelling and novel technology? There's a lot of activity. Not everyone involved is an idiot or rube. The jadedness makes my head spin.
307.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I haven't had the chance to dig in yet, but my impression is that it's less opinionated than LangChain. I'd love to know if that's true or not, since I'm really trying to prioritize my time around learning this stuf
308.
by ryanklee 3y ago
You should have led with generosity instead of tacking it on at the end. It might have saved me from having a ridiculous conversation about the cadence of my words, and instead there might have been a higher chance of someone saying someth
309.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I'm not considering outsiders. Why should I. It's a reasonable assumption that readers of HN are accustomed to ridiculous sounding tech product names. Further, this is a comment on a thread regarding a particularly new technology
310.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Not quite sure what the spirit of your comment is. But, yes, they are real technologies. Very confused as to why you would even find that dubious.
311.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I'm personally starting with learning Guidance and LMQL rather than LangChain just in order to get a better grasp of the behaviors that I've gathered LangChain papers over. Even after that, I'm likely to look at Haystack befo
312.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Just reminding you that the commenter asked for others to offer their take on whether or not the request was perceived to be creepy. I didn't go out of my way to offer unsolicited commentary on this. If you don't want to hear that
313.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Tough luck then I guess? I suppose I don't see the need to have access to every individual on a private basis merely because they comment somewhere on the internet. If they welcomed private interactions, then they would indicate a mean
314.
by ryanklee 3y ago
The Internet is full of individuals with weird intentions. I don't at all see how being conservative in the kind of interactions one allows for is a bad idea.
315.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I think it's pretty inappropriate. If you have a legit reason to reach out, then you can find a way to do it privately. Letting your private intentions leak into public forums is a bad look and a red flag. If I were the person you are
316.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I like the list, but the list name itself might be better!
317.
by ryanklee 3y ago
How does this compare to Guidance?
318.
by ryanklee 3y ago
The worst thing about headlines ending in a question mark is having to read snarky, untrue comments invoking Betteridge's Law. Such an empty meme.
319.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I don't see anything wrong with rank ordering existential threats.
320.
by ryanklee 3y ago
It's these kinds of unprimed expressions of authentic astonishment that can mark off the entrance to new cultural territory in tech. They don't always accompany quantum leaps, but whenever you do hear such noises, you can be sure
321.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Just one side of the coin. On the other almost all legitimate knowledge work is going to have a whole mass of previously onerous requirements rendered trivial.
322.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I completely agree with you. The only way this isn't true is if progress ceases because of some kind of socioeconomic catastrophy. We have already gotten over whatever hurdles there were that made supernnormal AI capability look potent
323.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Are people not generally inclined to engage in conversation around topics that interest them?
324.
by ryanklee 3y ago
I totally disagree. The capabilities speak for themselves, no need for any hype agents.
325.
by ryanklee 3y ago
This question is totally baffling to me. Have you used these tools? The capabilities are astounding and dreamlike (and also a nightmare). I was born in the early 80s. There are only 2 other techno-socio moments in my life that have hit as h
326.
by ryanklee 3y ago
In the coming months, all these idiotic hot takes are going to get washed away by the raging sea of value transformation that is generative AI. No one will even have the strength to stand up in the surf to blabber on like this. The amount o
327.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Hmm, switching costs are high when monoliths reign, and competitors need to be much, much better in order to attract people from other offerings. I think what you are pointing to is how network effects suck up customers the first time when
328.
by ryanklee 3y ago
What's disappointing is that it's not totally obvious to the majority of people in tech and adjacent industries and the public at large how full of shit Elon Musk is. There's no need or benefit for me to sit here and make ref
329.
by ryanklee 3y ago
It's just one more scam. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL-eVf9RWeoWH5ijYfF9eh_lyw...
330.
by ryanklee 3y ago
Doesn't have anything to do with it. My objection to Musk is that he doesn't have any idea what he's talking about, as usual, and also like usual, loudly and confidently. It's infuriating to see so many people taken in b

More ›