rxm233

22 ms·

1.
by rxm233 7mo ago
I've definitely seen this, I have a theory as to how this kind of thing actually would affect AI predictions since people seem to only focus on the pure-productivity enhancing effects of AI and discounting the fact that a large portion
2.
by rxm233 7mo ago
I guess in their defense, they are attempting to do something albeit in a way that makes things worse for everyone else.
3.
by rxm233 7mo ago
I agree, the irony is thick for better or for worse
4.
by rxm233 7mo ago
It’s hard to evaluate or even define “fake” work from any kind of data-driven perspective since you can always take the stance that it accomplishes some unobservable goal and is therefore done for a good reason. I think a lot of people don’
5.
by rxm233 7mo ago
Seems like you’re part of the group of companies that is actually trying to do real, actual work, so yeah… seems like AI is going to help you and do things that weren’t done before. My point is that a LOT of “work” is not like this in large
6.
by rxm233 7mo ago
Lol. Is this an AI post?
7.
AI is supercharging fake work
13 points by rxm233 7mo ago|10 comments
8.
by rxm233 3y ago
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that I was talking about an early stage startup. If anything, I mean a 50+ person company. I agree if it's 2 people, you probably want someone to be shipping stuff all the time.
9.
by rxm233 3y ago
In either case you can hire people to build and ship. But should the CTO also be one of those people?
10.
by rxm233 3y ago
In consulting "AI" firms, do you think engineering is more necessary than the actual AI part? To me, it seems that in those situations, knowing when and where to apply certain models could actually solve a lot of business problems
11.
Ask HN: Should the CTO of an AI company be a scientist or an engineer?
4 points by rxm233 3y ago|7 comments