rwxrwxrwx

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by rwxrwxrwx 3y ago

   I always find it easier to produce publication-quality figures using gnuplot (but not with its defaults settings, mind you) than with Matplotlib. Check out http://gnuplotting.org/ Also, it's hard to beat gnuplot's
2. 2.▲
   by rwxrwxrwx 3y ago

   The command is equivalent to the more verbose: plot 'data.dat' using 1:3 with points pointtype 7 linecolor 3 title 'Interesting measurements'
3. 3.▲
   by rwxrwxrwx 3y ago

   Stop moving the goalposts: your answer to a commenter who stated that Common Lisp was faster than Python (a fact) was a list of packages, many of which are (1) not even written in Python and (2) some of them actually do have Common Lisp bin
4. 4.▲
   by rwxrwxrwx 3y ago

   For the sake of anyone reading this thread who isn't in the know: many of these libraries are really written in C/C++ and have Python bindings.
5. 5.▲
   by rwxrwxrwx 3y ago

   Too real.
6. 6.▲
   by rwxrwxrwx 4y ago

   You might also be interested in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32363295
7. 7.▲
   CACM special issue on Lisp (1991)(cacm.acm.org)

   44 points by rwxrwxrwx 4y ago|4 comments
8. 8.▲
   by rwxrwxrwx 4y ago

   Communications of the ACM, September 1991 (Vol. 34, No. 9)
9. 9.▲
   by rwxrwxrwx 4y ago

   The Apache HTTP Server and the GNU Scientific Library come to mind.
10. 10.▲
    by rwxrwxrwx 5y ago

    One possible way could be extracting the product type marking codes / marking information from a large collection of data sheets.