rwolf

34 ms·

331.
by rwolf 17y ago
I'm sure this is a very nice piece for the members of the audience currently working in small firms; it's very reassuring. Apart from the feel-good "do your best and things will be okay," I'm wondering if the implicit advice to not worry ab
332.
by rwolf 17y ago
It's always bugged me how deficient perldocs seemed compared to php.net's layout. Hurray for change!
333.
by rwolf 17y ago
It's hard to remember that everyone doesn't have 7+ Gb of email storage. If I wanted to use a service like this, I can't imagine an email with the fulltext of a listing being big enough to ever bother me. Giving your users the option to onl
334.
by rwolf 17y ago
I may be wrong, but I believe the page is not suggesting a temporary TechCrunch boycott by advertisers. While I agree that advertisers are not Arrington's boss, they do have more leverage than your average commenter (as the linked page says
335.
by rwolf 17y ago
Forget intelligent guesses--what about the profit to be made from handing some control over to machines. Put a machine in charge of making tiny price changes (and reacting correctly to the resulting changes in demand) to blindly suck every
336.
by rwolf 17y ago
Bad security does not mean Twitter deserves to have it's data stolen. Break in to show Twitter it can be done, maybe publicly prove you did it for internet love (if you're into that sort of thing); leaking everything you could get your "lee
337.
by rwolf 17y ago
It'll be interesting to see what journalism is all about when the dust settles and we figure out how (if it's possible) to make it profitable online. It's not clear yet if journalists will go the way of the elevator operator, and I wish any
338.
by rwolf 17y ago
I think I could agree with airing a companies' dirty laundry if it was dirty enough. Techcrunch would have mentioned it if they found anything that was more than vaguely interesting, so I feel confident saying that they don't have anything
339.
by rwolf 17y ago
I believe the claim that hidim is steganography comes from the title of hackernews link. The site itself claims to represent torrents as .png, but not to disguise them. The claim that this will frustrate search engines is true, in the sense
340.
by rwolf 17y ago
another way around the rate limits is to ask to be whitelisted ( http://twitter.com/help/request_whitelisting ). twitter was even nice enough to whitelist my test account the last time I asked.
341.
by rwolf 17y ago
my mistake :)
342.
by rwolf 17y ago
From http://themachinelearningforum.org/index.php/component/conte... , users have to send you an email after they upload photos. I suggest fixing this clunkiness, to give your site the best chance to attract users.