rvncerr

14 ms·

1.
Tarantool 1.9.0 has been released(github.com)
1 points by rvncerr 9y ago|0 comments
2.
Vinyl – goes stable(github.com)
1 points by rvncerr 9y ago|0 comments
3.
The cat-and-mouse story of implementing anti-spam for email service(highscalability.com)
1 points by rvncerr 10y ago|0 comments
4.
The cat-and-mouse story of implementing anti-spam for Mail.Ru email service(medium.com)
3 points by rvncerr 10y ago|0 comments
5.
An IoT hackathon that makes a difference(medium.com)
1 points by rvncerr 10y ago|1 comments
6.
Building Nginx and Tarantool based services(highscalability.com)
4 points by rvncerr 11y ago|0 comments
7.
by rvncerr 11y ago
I'll try to benchmark it soon. Thank you!
8.
by rvncerr 11y ago
I've used my simple Memcached module, not Couchbase SDK.
9.
by rvncerr 11y ago
I haven't tried PostgreSQL as an in-memory solution, but in my another benchmark it has reached a good performance in comparison with other on-disk solutions. Thank you! I've scheduled benchmark of PostgreSQL in RAM.
10.
by rvncerr 11y ago
I will try it. Thank you!
11.
by rvncerr 11y ago
Underperforming might be caused by my YCSB memcached driver... I'll revise it. Memcached utilized all CPUs during the benchmark. P.S. All VM images are open, you can repeat the benchmark if you wish.
12.
by rvncerr 11y ago
This is only a first try. I'm going to make another review of a large number of NoSQL solutions soon. Aerospike will be observed there.
13.
by rvncerr 11y ago
Yes, it is. When I was running the test, CouchBase 4.x hasn't been released.
14.
by rvncerr 11y ago
No, I ran two instances close to each other (in one DC). For example, Tarantool and CouchBase were installed on nosql-1 instance and YCSB client on nosql-2 (There are links to *.vhd files in the article).
15.
How to choose an in-memory NoSQL solution: Performance measuring(articles.rvncerr.org)
9 points by rvncerr 11y ago|4 comments