ruthmarx

23 ms·

301.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
Isn't Web Platform Incubator Community Group the group browsers makers formed because the W3C was being too slow and then largely overtook the W3C in terms of relevance?
302.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
> It certanly looks like. With what's been going on in the world and with Russia, it really doesn't. That's the thing.
303.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
Sigh. I didn't misunderstand anything, I specifically said in this particular instance his claims might be valid, in contrast to your outright dismissal of them. What a frustrating and pointless discussion because you were so set on mi
304.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
Not a great answer since I was saying your claim specifically didn't apply to him , i.e. one person. Look at the logic of this conversation, a paraphrased version of the actual one we had: --- Submission: Jack the firefighter says x Y
305.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
How did you extrapolate 'everyone' from my sentence saying 'for his'?
306.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
That only works with a web of independent and constant verification. These days no one checks their sources, and whole networks of people make decision to benefit their views and wants, and not to disclose facts no matter the findings.
307.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
I mean, it's likely not just deflection/paranoia in his case.
308.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
counterstrike by itself might be OK although not used as branding, but none of the stylized forms could be used - that's my understanding at least.
309.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
That you can split any finite length into an infinite amount does not equate to having to traverse infinite numbers.
310.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
> And if they make a million more fighting piracy rather than not then they'll do it. Right, but they don't. That's the point. > It's clear the Coca Cola company made it's decision there. The question is to wh
311.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
If you're out of touch, then you can monitor sites like torrenfreak that report relevant news and discussion forums that are seemingly legal like r/piracy on reddit. > it’s almost impossible to achieve an even half-decent expe
312.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
> It's huge enough risk that they still choose to invest in fighting it. It's not a risk though. Movies still make over a billion dollars regularly. All it is is greed and ignorance. > But clearly they determined it's c
313.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
Google's been removing torrent links for years now. People share these links in Discord, Reddit, Telegram etc - companies are not taking them down anytime soon. It's literally an unbeatable hydra.
314.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
> Autism can be reliably diagnosed at 2.5 years of age, so we probably aren't looking at a strong cultural bias in in how kids are presenting with autism. These models using data from countries where the healthcare systems provides
315.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
Well, there's a lot of opinion on the subject but personally I'm er much against disproportionately high penalties as a deterrent because it's comes at the cost of justice to the individual. That aside though, there isn'
316.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
It's wasted money though. They're literally just losing more money on whatever money they think they lost due to piracy.
317.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
I don't think the impact has ever truly been huge, although it is almost always overstated.
318.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
The pirates remain triumphant and unshakeable. Why? Because you can go to any number of torrent sites you want right now and download anything you want, and as long as it's not too obscure it will probably not take more than 10 or 2
319.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
True, but the submission refers to something called 'Piracy Shield', so copyrighted material seems pretty relevant.
320.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
> This suggests that although autism has a strong association with genetics, neurophysiology unique to autism develops in the context of highly complex genetic associations that are likely subject genetic drift across population and time
321.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
> Companies like Google and Cloudflare just really don't care that they host malicious content and have stopped taking meaningful action to take down reported content. Honestly I find it incredibly silly companies are still sending
322.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
VR isn't that amazing yet, you may as well just sit close to a big screen curved TV with earphones if going in person isn't ultimately that important. If the smells, sights, people you meet, experience including entering the count
323.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
> I really don't understand the obsession with the idea that I must somehow be interested in something just because somebody else said it. I That's not the point I'm making. The point I'm making is Twitter has been to
324.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
This looks really cool, thanks for sharing!
325.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
There's something ironic about 'hackers' being so incredibly stuck in their ways.
326.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
> It will change some, I think it can change significantly. The devil is in the details in this case. > but if the general idea is that people are bad at knowing what they want and avoiding temptation,v If it's a general idea tho
327.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
> hahahaha! thank you! starting my day with a belly laugh is a great privilege! That's a really weird reaction. Like, yeah, he's a clown, but he has still made tweets that get discussed in thew news and here on HN. > doesn&#
328.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
> Incorrect. The basis of my claim is that people are often wrong about what will make them happy. > Addiction is not the basis of my claim, it was just a single example of people choosing wrong. In this specific instance, of using ph
329.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
> Because you keep phrasing things as if wrong and condescending are the same, No, that's purely an issue with your interpretation. Drop your assumptions and look at it more objectively, if you can. > Right now, the best way to s
330.
by ruthmarx 2y ago
> I mean, yes: this point is true. Usually that's how things are. Strongly disagree. > It's not a matter of knowing better, it's a matter of people not considering X. You're making the same mistake the other fellow

More ›