ruszki

12 ms·

211.
by ruszki 9mo ago
Is lane keeping really a solved problem? Just last year one of my brand new rented cars tried to kill me a few times when I tried it again, and so far not even the simple lane leaving detection mechanism worked properly in any of the tried
212.
by ruszki 9mo ago
I don’t think that it’s possible to not have a strong profile on you. I’m using Librewolf with a ton of anti fingerprinting tools, separate sessions for everything, blocking any ads, social media SDKs, Google things, like Analytics, don’t e
213.
by ruszki 9mo ago
Yeah, and I was confused by the child comments under yours. They clearly didn’t read your link.
214.
by ruszki 9mo ago
And it’s possible that it wouldn’t have mattered anyway. I got a green light to do an integration in a week alone, which was planned for a team of 5 for half a year. We knew that it cannot be that much. So I delivered… It was never used. It
215.
by ruszki 9mo ago
I heard already a story like that. My home country’s government made already some decisions based on some vibe code verified by nobody. It was made by one of my friends. Nobody cares.
216.
by ruszki 9mo ago
> They aren't doing this for anyone's safety. Strictly speaking, this is not completely true. When you call an emergency number, it’s very good that they can see exactly where you are. That was how this was sold 15+ years ago.
217.
by ruszki 9mo ago
Positive sum game started to collapse more than 3 decades ago. So it’s not that simple as just “unregulated tech industry”. They made it worse for sure, but they’re not the only reason.
218.
by ruszki 9mo ago
No, I drove them, and also knowing how they sacrificed safety for example by integrating a lot of safety critical systems for the sake of price.
219.
by ruszki 9mo ago
Making good cars. They can make cheap ones, maybe acceptable ones, but not good ones. They are not there yet. Of course, the general populace doesn’t really care, and the vast majority of the market is not driven by this, but still.
220.
by ruszki 9mo ago
I think that the first smartphones were way smaller than today’s ones played a role. They were not that elongated either, the aspect ratio was way closer to a square. I could easily reach the top bar back then. It was definitely not a hurdl
221.
by ruszki 9mo ago
Yep, at least that’s what I know of. They refresh it several times per day, but it’s more than enough to check it once per day.
222.
by ruszki 9mo ago
I don’t know, but it’s interesting that he and many others come up with this “we should act like LLMs are junior devs”. There is a reason why most junior devs work on fairly separate parts of products, most of the time parts which can be re
223.
by ruszki 9mo ago
Working code doesn’t mean the same for everyone. My coworker just started vibe coding. Her code works… on happy paths. It absolutely doesn’t work when any kind of error happens. It’s also absolutely impossible to refactor it in any way. She
224.
by ruszki 9mo ago
As I understood it’s enough to have “access to run privileged application” anywhere where the packet goes through. So, not necessarily at client or server sides. Or did I misunderstand?
225.
by ruszki 9mo ago
Saying that they “discovered” them is a stretch.
226.
by ruszki 9mo ago
Can you give an example please? What kind of complexity are we talking about?
227.
by ruszki 9mo ago
The article explains how to style radio buttons with CSS however you want. What’s the problem with that?
228.
by ruszki 9mo ago
It's not "maybe". As someone who born in Hungary, and have been experiencing our lovely full blown fascist propaganda longer than it became mainstream in the US, Fox News is definitely worse than our main propaganda channel.
229.
by ruszki 9mo ago
One of my friends did a job for a government. He generated the code for it with some LLM. It provided a result which was about what he thought should be. He - or anybody - never checked the code whether it really calculated what it should h
230.
by ruszki 9mo ago
I want to see an example of this. Any real example. So far what I’ve seen, I wouldn’t give my name to any of those barely usable code, and most of the time they were even slower, especially when they pretended that they reviewed their code.
231.
by ruszki 9mo ago
What parent commenter meant was language level support of immutable objects. There is const, in for example JavaScript, but it supports only immutability of variables, not objects themselves. That later one is possible in C++ for example, w
232.
by ruszki 9mo ago
Your hypothetical situation would cause all progress to halt. Nobody would be able to fix genuine problems.
233.
by ruszki 9mo ago
Luckily I write way more infrequently :) This one right here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46384118 It’s absolutely not enough to “keep an eye on it on your phone”. You need to know that the implementation of the te
234.
by ruszki 9mo ago
When has he stated that he uses AI like that? The last I heard about him a month ago, he specifically stated that he was not interested in AI to write code: https://www.zdnet.com/article/linus-torvalds-ai-tool-maintai..
235.
by ruszki 9mo ago
Generating also the tests happens a little bit too often for any kind of improvement. simonw posted here a generated “something” the other day, which he didn’t know whether it’s really working or not, but he was happy that his generated, co
236.
by ruszki 10mo ago
There were such people also here. Copy-pasting the code would have been faster than their work, and there were several problems with their results. But they were so convinced that their work is quick and flawless, that they post a video rec
237.
by ruszki 10mo ago
Have you just called a 50 years old food pyramid as previous? This guideline has been released every 5 years.
238.
by ruszki 10mo ago
It’s maybe unpopular, but people should feel bad about it, especially they should feel shame. I don’t feel it either, who knows this for decades, and even tried a few times. But I should. There is exactly zero pressure regarding this.
239.
by ruszki 10mo ago
There is a difference between inflating your work, and flat out lie. The previous guidelines weren’t against protein at all. The mentioned war didn’t exist at all in these. The protein target is about the same as 10 years ago. Back then the
240.
by ruszki 10mo ago
Yeah, but there is a difference, between if at least one people at one point of time understood the code (or the specific part of it), and none. Also, there are different levels. Wildfly’s code for example is utterly incomprehensible, becau

More ›