ruszki

11 ms·

181.
by ruszki 8mo ago
I hit limit of Pro in about 30 minutes, 1 hour max. And only when I use a single session, and when I don't use it extensively, ie waits for my responses, and I read and really understand what it wants, what it does. That's still j
182.
by ruszki 8mo ago
> I managed to fix my source code alone, like twelve months ago. I’ve just mentioned to one of my friend yesterday, that you cannot do this anymore properly with new things. I’ve started a new project with some few years old Android libr
183.
by ruszki 8mo ago
You can write in it like in imperative languages. I did it when I first encountered it long time ago, and I didn’t know how to write, or why I should write code in a functional way. It’s like how you can write in an object oriented way in s
184.
by ruszki 8mo ago
Chat Control was nowhere near to become law. Last Fall, they would have voted about whether they really talk about it, but even that failed. Even if it would have been successful, nothing would have guaranteed that it becomes a law, or that
185.
by ruszki 8mo ago
Do you really trust in random comments on the internet which states something to which the possibility is slim, because literally nobody cares why somebody calls the way it is, when that somebody knows both names, and when it's not pol
186.
by ruszki 8mo ago
> Or it could have just been a genuine question. Yes, exactly that’s why I wrote several examples to support why the chance for that is very-very slim.
187.
by ruszki 8mo ago
That’s also an option. The left to right flow is better for the sake of autocomplete and comprehension: when you start to read your right to left version, you don’t know what is p, then row, then mat. With left to right, this problem doesn’
188.
by ruszki 8mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_De... Stoping and questioning why somebody uses DoD or DoW is way more telling than using any of those. Especially that both are perfectly fine, even officially
189.
by ruszki 8mo ago
> [p for mat in state_dict.values() for row in mat for p in row] I'm so happy without seeing Python list comprehensions nowadays. I don't know why they couldn't go with something like this: [state_dict.values() for mat for
190.
by ruszki 8mo ago
I met a coder, who has several self made programming languages, and I would never allow him anywhere near any codebases for which I'm responsible. So writing a Lisp dialect, is not something which makes you a good coder for sure. Even
191.
by ruszki 8mo ago
I don't understand how some people decide here, who the good programmers are. A lot of people reminded me a guy from West Palm Beach, who votes on elections solely on the principle of who has more "fame". Paul Graham is famou
192.
by ruszki 8mo ago
Just from coding: Clean Code. Most companies require this on principle. But nobody follows it. And there is a good reason, because if you follow it, your code will be completely unreadable and thus unmaintainable.
193.
by ruszki 8mo ago
Or, like me, the kind of questions in which I’m interested are answered in a way worse rate by LLMs than StackOverflow, like ever. I have and had problems with StackOverflow. But LLMs are nowhere near that, and unfortunately, as we can see,
194.
by ruszki 8mo ago
Because in such adversarial environments, your best employees leave, and quickly. And those people worth way more than half of your workforce.
195.
by ruszki 8mo ago
Which response are we talking about which was problematic?
196.
by ruszki 8mo ago
This was one of the most outrageous data grab in the past years. They replaced the completely working simple Mail app, which I used until that point, with this garbage, and I was just lucky that I paid attention, and I stopped for a sec wha
197.
by ruszki 8mo ago
> This article has nothing to do with the current tête-à-tête with the Pentagon. The article yes, but we cannot be sure about its topic. We definitely cannot claim that they are unrelated. We don't know. It's possible that the
198.
by ruszki 8mo ago
My iPhone, when it was new, 3 and a half years ago, could handle two days, while I used it heavily, with hotspot on for hours at places where signal was terrible. GPS was almost always on. And I used it heavily because I was on the go a lot
199.
by ruszki 8mo ago
I think there is a huge gap between people who has a good CLAUDE.md (or similar), or those who doesn’t. When I first tried, the created code was garbage. Now that I slowly built my memory, several thousands of manually written examples and
200.
by ruszki 8mo ago
You need to be cautious with the notion of “his votes go either way”. In Hungary, where I’m from, and a Trump kinda guy rules for 16 years, judges vote either way… but they vote against the government only when it doesn’t really matter for
201.
by ruszki 8mo ago
What is the difference between those cases and Steamboat Willie? Besides the obvious that those happened in different countries.
202.
by ruszki 8mo ago
I don’t know but I and my friends still visit China regularly, but not the US anymore, because we have no clue what’s the expectation there to not be in a jail for weeks. I have quite clear idea what the expectation in China, but not the US
203.
by ruszki 8mo ago
Which book is that?
204.
by ruszki 8mo ago
There is a difference when you simply lazy, or don’t care enough to understand the information in front of you, or when they don’t provide those information. You’re right, most people don’t care enough, but this is a huge difference. And we
205.
by ruszki 8mo ago
> not giving a shit about the quality of work one delivers I’ve learned in the past decades that people who care about quality is the minority. Look at any B2B software. They don’t care because their customers are different than who uses
206.
by ruszki 8mo ago
But for that designers should care about the limitations. But they don’t care. Not even about the more basic ones. I’m quite sure many of them don’t even know. Mainly, because their customers are not the one who code. I got many designs for
207.
by ruszki 8mo ago
First of all, hyperparameters. Second, organization, or connections. 3rd, cost function. 4th, activation function. 5th type of learning. Etc. These are not weights. These were parts of models.
208.
by ruszki 8mo ago
It depends on time. 5 years ago it was quite well defined that it’s the last one, maybe the second one in some context. Especially when distinction was important, it was always the last one. In our case it was. We trained models to have wei
209.
by ruszki 8mo ago
> I assured it I wasn’t planning on making a nuke, or actually trying to build a plutonium showerhead Claude does the same, and you can greatly exploit this. When you talk about hypotheticals it responds way more unethically. I tested it
210.
by ruszki 8mo ago
Not just laziness of writing scripts, but also laziness of learning what your options are, like inside the framework you use, or what is available off the shelf. And btw AI is also terrible with this, because they learned from the same code

More ›