rudolf0

15 ms·

91.
by rudolf0 10y ago
I don't think that particular position is necessarily a hateful one. He's arguing from pragmatism. I don't agree with him at all (in this case or any other), but he's an openly gay (and self-admittedly promiscuous) man h
92.
by rudolf0 10y ago
Part of me wishes the same, but then I remember all the advantages of having no contacts or glasses and I know it's worth it. Carrying around eye drops isn't that much of a hassle, and the dry eye usually is just more uncomfortabl
93.
by rudolf0 10y ago
I got PRK a year ago. No real issues, 20/20 vision, but the persistent dry eye is annoying. It's really bad in the winter. Artificial tear eye drops help a lot, but sometimes I have to use them twice per day.
94.
by rudolf0 10y ago
>You really don't see anything incongruent about the article's premise and his "conclusion", nor do you see that it's a preposterously philosophically-foolish position to take? He's okay with marrying a wome
95.
by rudolf0 10y ago
Fair.
96.
by rudolf0 10y ago
Maybe I just have an incorrection definition of misogyny. I would call it a sexist agenda, not necessarily a misogynistic one.
97.
by rudolf0 10y ago
>Why should we turn a blind eye to a source that continually posts provably fake and completely contrived news stories? I interpreted your statement here to mean you should group it along with other fake news distributors and which Faceb
98.
by rudolf0 10y ago
Here's the summary of his stance: >When I express views like this, I’m sometimes called a reactionary. People say I want to go back to the 50s. And they’re right – but it’s the 650s BC I want to return to, because Sparta had the rig
99.
by rudolf0 10y ago
He's citing university studies there. I disagree with the premise and the conclusions, but it's not fair to call it misogyny. More just like paleo-conservatism/traditionalism/neo-reaction. It's a (I think, false) be
100.
by rudolf0 10y ago
It cites real data from a real scientist. I disagree with the conclusion and the premise just like you do, but it's absolutely not "fake news". >The professor's finding are a very small, small part of the overall ar
101.
by rudolf0 10y ago
>How is this frightening? Why should we turn a blind eye to a source that continually posts provably fake and completely contrived news stories? Most of Breitbart's inflammatory-headline stories are based on real scientific studies.
102.
by rudolf0 10y ago
Assuming the router is somehow allowing NAT punctures or port forwarding, or if there is no router, then any easily compromised device will be compromised within 5 minutes of connecting it to the Internet. Usually much less than 5 minutes.
103.
by rudolf0 10y ago
I'd be the sole developer for some time, but there may be many more developers after a few months.
104.
by rudolf0 10y ago
Even if the Paris Agreement has its problems, do you really think it's worse than no climate agreement?
105.
by rudolf0 10y ago
>Turnout was lower for both the D's and the R's Could this not be because Clinton was wildly unpopular? Even more unpopular than she was during the primaries? >Sanders wrote an essay that stated women fantasize about being r
106.
Is it unwise to start a large, new project with CoffeeScript?
1 points by rudolf0 10y ago|2 comments
107.
by rudolf0 10y ago
Yeah, not sure why he was punished so harshly for something that probably didn't inconvenience users too much and was clearly intended as a prank. I do see that Myspace might've spent $20,000 or more to remediate th situation but
108.
by rudolf0 10y ago
I'd argue the Myspace worm [1] was what really got him the fame. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samy_(computer_worm)
109.
by rudolf0 10y ago
That doesn't make their favoritism any more right.
110.
by rudolf0 10y ago
https://packetsled.com/packetsled-response-to-matt-harrigan-... >PacketSled takes recent comments made by our CEO, seriously. Once we were made aware of these comments, we immediately reported this information to the sec
111.
by rudolf0 10y ago
I wonder what the killer app for VR will be. (I guess we also need the killer headset first, which is still yet to come.)
112.
by rudolf0 10y ago
Quite possibly.
113.
by rudolf0 10y ago
You're in for a fun 4 years, then.
114.
by rudolf0 10y ago
Well, yes. But what's your point? Her being bad doesn't make Hillary good.
115.
by rudolf0 10y ago
Genetic similarity is definitely a poor measure, but keep in mind many (including myself) consider testing on mice highly unethical as well.
116.
by rudolf0 10y ago
The real cognitive dissonance is testing on them or slaughtering them for food vs. pampering them and trying to save endangered species, etc. The testing is often worse since it may involve torture and/or mutilation.
117.
by rudolf0 10y ago
Actually, my impression is she tried to listen... she just didn't have it in her. There were many moments through the campaign where she tried to come across as organic and authentic, but even that seemed awkward and forced. She just
118.
by rudolf0 10y ago
I think you're making a false equivalency here. Both sides are very thin-skinned, no doubt, but one is a direct insult ("you are deplorables") and one is taking general offense on behalf of other people for perceived slights.
119.
by rudolf0 10y ago
>As for likable, Hillary has been the most admired woman in America, 14 years straight. Trump ran the most negative fact free campaign ever to overcome her likability. I seem to recall a great amount of distaste to her, even coming from
120.
by rudolf0 10y ago
>I guess nobody around her who had an inkling dared to raise their hand. Can't even imagine what they'd say "Ma'am, people don't believe what you are saying, can you be more genuine a bit?"... Check out of s

More ›