rudiksz

5 ms·

1.
by rudiksz 2mo ago
"agents talking to each other"? Are you for real dude?
2.
by rudiksz 2mo ago
Claude is the Deepak Chopra of computer programming. Reviewing PR's created by it is 90% digesting the meaningless word salads in the comments, and the rest is figuring out that it has nothing to do with the code it is commenting.
3.
by rudiksz 2mo ago
AI easily generates PR's with thousands of lines. I my company there's even a directive for agents to split up their work into multiple PR's based on some arbitrary metric of files/lines changed. When one of my colleague
4.
by rudiksz 7mo ago
Claude isn't generating code that is "highly effective and usable code". I'm not your friend but I also reject your claims out of hand because I've also seen what Claude can and can't do.
5.
by rudiksz 1y ago
AI code fixer.
6.
by rudiksz 1y ago
"All the other work" being "fixing the code written by AI".
7.
by rudiksz 2y ago
The whole "I can move faster" with a framework is also just an illusion that appears at the beginning of building an app. It will quickly disappear as more devs who do all have a different idea about how the framework should be us
8.
by rudiksz 2y ago
It's mostly Go, some Python, and I'm not asking anything niche. I'm asking for basic utility functions that I could implement in 10-20 lines of code. There's something broken every single time and I spend more time debug
9.
by rudiksz 2y ago
> "seasoned programmers are using LLMs better". I do not remember a single instance when code provided to me by an LLM worked at all. Even if I ask something small that cand be done in 4-5 lines of code is always broken. From a
10.
by rudiksz 2y ago
As far as style is concerned: 1) try to use "for := range" loops instead of the traditional for 2) "var result [4]string" - really seems like this wants to be a struct with a couple of fields. type result struct {
11.
by rudiksz 2y ago
Yes, a resourceful chess player could gain an upper hand over any opponent who might have a jeans fetish. And we can't have that, can we.
12.
by rudiksz 2y ago
Half of the language is already non-nullable and is accomplished by allowing for zero values. Non pointer variables are guaranteed to be never nil. What is missing is the ability to have pointer variables and have the compiler ensure that i
13.
by rudiksz 4y ago
That's pretty much what they said. Most programmers don't work on "personal websites" at their workplace, as strange as that might sound.