rudhdb773b

6 ms·

31.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
> Social proof of account activity pre-llm (usable) could be a very important thing in the future. It's already common practice to buy aged accounts with good reputations, so even that doesn't mean much.
32.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
Are there any up-to-date offline/private agentic coding benchmark leaderboards? If the tests haven't been published anywhere and are sufficiently different from standard problems, I would think the benchmarks would be robust to in
33.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
That will definitely be a problem, but I suspect and hope that there will be governing AI models that can be "prompted" with clear and concise instructions that will be demonstrably free of bias towards any group, either by a dire
34.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
Because unlike natural life, which has evolved to be highly competitive and self-interested, we would explicitly set the AI's objectives to always benefit society.
35.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
That's why I see AI (with a clear set of provided objectives and guidelines, i.e., a constitution) as the future of government. As dystopian as that sounds, it's the only way I see to truly rid ourselves of corruption.
36.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
Heavy trucks aren't required for the vast majority of residential deliveries. If you order anything in Bangkok, even say a refrigerator or a king size mattress, it will almost always be delivered by a modestly sized pickup truck (with
37.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
I view posting online with a real name like getting a permanent tattoo. My values or priorities may significantly change over decades, especially as a child, so why would I want to jeopardize the reputation of a potential future identity wi
38.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
Did you have a contract with SEC? Just wondering what kind of business would have an interest in that.
39.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
The critical point is who the "we" is. Is "we" the parents teaching their children their own unique values, or is the "we" a government or corporation forcing one set of values on all children. Why not encourag
40.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
Grok has been and still is the best at incorporating search. 4.20 with its 4 agents puts it back at the top for reasoning as well. As soon as it's added to the API, the benchmarks should show that.
41.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
Why? If I had to choose, I'd much rather use a phone controlled by a jurisdiction in which I don't live or have any business.
42.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
The security of Android doesn't mean much to me as long as the front door is left open by design for Google, and therefore the government, to directly spy on you.
43.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
Grow up.
44.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
I have as well. But for it to really work, don't you need to hand over the monopoly on violence directly to AI? Any human discretion would be abused by elites, so AI would be in full control. And once it's given control, there&#
45.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
It's not currently, but if we were able to use AI to generate laws in an objective and logically sound way based on general principles like "don't harm others or their property", we'd be much better off.
46.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
Silly logical mistakes like that are rapidly decreasing in frequency as models improve, and I see no reason why they won't soon be a thing of the past. For example, I haven't seen Grok make a mistake like that in a long time, and
47.
by rudhdb773b 8mo ago
My suggestions: Desktop - Librewolf Android - Ironfox
48.
by rudhdb773b 9mo ago
> No wonder the US is collapsing as we speak. If you look at the longterm trend in government intrusion into our personal lives, you'll see it's largely increasing, so if anything, the cause of any "collapse" would be
49.
by rudhdb773b 9mo ago
I agree that children need restrictions, but that's the role of their parents, not the government.
50.
by rudhdb773b 9mo ago
In the context of government legislation on personal behavior, yes. Parents should be the ones setting up rules for their children.
51.
by rudhdb773b 9mo ago
Would you also want the government to ban junk food and recreational drugs? What about unprotected premarital sex? I'd much rather live in a society with personal freedoms than a "healthier" one with government mandates on p
52.
by rudhdb773b 9mo ago
Isn't it mostly ChatGPT that does that? Grok almost never uses emojis.
53.
by rudhdb773b 9mo ago
Is the desktop/laptop linux market share really over 4%? What is that based on?
54.
by rudhdb773b 9mo ago
It's not. I'm not familiar with Venezuela, but here in SE Asia if I want to open a small business say a bar along the beach, I just pay off the local police with a small cut of my profits. Where I grew up in the US, it would eit
55.
by rudhdb773b 9mo ago
> Why would non state actors be any less scary? Non-state actors can't easily use violence to throw me in jail.
56.
by rudhdb773b 9mo ago
I don't know why this is down voted. It's a very valid point. In countries where the police and government officials can be bought for pocket change by the middle class, the masses have relatively more power vs the elite who cont
57.
by rudhdb773b 9mo ago
I don't really mind private surveillance. It's when the data gets sold or otherwise obtained by state powers that it gets scary.
58.
by rudhdb773b 9mo ago
But does a battery fire on a plane pose a much more significant risk than anywhere else one carries a battery in his daily life? At least on a plane, you have well-trained staff and fire extinguishers readily available.
59.
by rudhdb773b 9mo ago
Are battery fires on planes a common problem? I haven't heard of many, at least with any significant consequences. And what would you suggest be done to reduce the risk? Asking passengers to travel without phones or laptops isn'
60.
by rudhdb773b 9mo ago
You're already allowed to refill large water bottles from a water fountain after passing through security, so the situation you described is already allowed to happen.

More ›