Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rubyfan
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
65 ms
·
871.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Same, except Laravel was new to me in that thread. Looks pretty similar to what you get with Rails but for PHP. Given the criteria I laid out in that post it looks viable. I’m honestly surprised since I left PHP for Ruby about 12-13 years a
872.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
See also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14974767
873.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Sure enough a valid point. When I didn’t know it I was productive too, circa Rails 0.14.3. I’ve stepped away for programming for many years and skipped mostly through Rails 3 and 4. Recently picked right back up in Rails 5 and just as produ
874.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Yes it’s just an ironic presentation.
875.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
The funny thing I see on the springboot quickstart page: Absolutely no code generation and no requirement for XML configuration And the very next thing is a maven xml config.
876.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
I’m after productivity ala Rails. Nothing seems to come close for me yet.
877.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Spring doesn’t seem as straightforward to me as I would hope. Play is similar, there is promise there but just too open ended.
878.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Great rant. In a way my question is a challenge the Rails is dead noise. Maybe I’m an old dog but the stuff I see lately misses the mark. Developers seem to spend a lot of time thinking about how they’re going to run their microservices bef
879.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
I used to work at a company in a similar vertical as BR also linked off CNN frequently and also running Rails. I understand the scalability challenges that might lead someone to something like Erlang and Elixir. Curious, what’s your take on
880.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
The thing that’s cool about Rails is there’s some common understanding of the Rails way and in theory I can hire easier I have consistency of this working across versions, etc. I know when I start a Rails project I’m a few steps away from
881.
▲
Ask HN: What are real Ruby on Rails alternatives in 2017?
40 points
by
rubyfan
9y ago
|
53 comments
882.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Reading this full article was a treat. Many would compare Trump to Nixon for character traits and alleged collusion with a foreign power to sway an election but I don’t this illustrates a similar situation here. If anything it shows how pol
883.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Solution Architect, Project Manager, Product Manager
884.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Second version of roughly the same story today. When flying sky high it’s easy to say bubble or correction coming soon. I see a better story. Pent up demand for growth investment. Big companies have largely been uninteresting over the last
885.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Interesting concept. The variables seem a little unintuitive to me.
886.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
I wonder if the people starring it are intentionally endorsing the fork or if they are just seeing Piwik for the first time. I saw Piwik show up on Github’s daily trending email today and didn’t realize the reason for the fork but the descr
887.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
So that clears thing up
888.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
tl;dr: Rails is great for rapid prototyping and product development. When your product is a successful API with scale and concurrency needs, other languages are better.
889.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Dupe https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14860834
890.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
I have yet to see something that does what Rails does. It’s opinionated and has a cohesive way for doing most things that just straight up doesn’t suck. Sure we have Play and Sping and legion of JS, Golang, Rust and now Kotlin flavors of Si
891.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
+1 after getting about half way through I accidentally scrolled into some other article and then couldn't use the back button, wtf.
892.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
As I was skimming README, I was thinking "what's the catch?" And there it is, you're absolutely right this is not an AOT compiler.
893.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Do we honestly believe Edison was a viable path forward for any IoT approach?
894.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Why is it a given that Intel have to be there? It maybe be a market that they are in fact not geared toward. Just because there is a market doesn't mean they need to be there, doesn't mean they can make money and doesn't nece
895.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Are you able to completely offset the sensor costs against the loss avoidance? Do actually observe a different risk profile in the type of customer willing to pay for a proactive service?
896.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Dupe. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14682816
897.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
Is anyone troubled that the study found bias against qualified candidates (who happen to be male) in current hiring practices? Is the objective to have hiring practices that are fair to all applicants (woman, minorities and even males)? Or
898.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
What is that quote from?
899.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
One would think the Internet offers the biggest catalog, yet here we are - you are free to read your news from any source and I mean any source, however the influence of big media remains. Choice and freedom doesn't mean a better infor
900.
▲
by
rubyfan
9y ago
In all this analysis we seem to be glossing over the fact that what IBM is selling in their Watson platform is not what played Jeopardy. The original point of criticism is that "Watson" in its current offering is little more than
More ›