3 ms·
Spring doesn’t seem as straightforward to me as I would hope. Play is similar, there is promise there but just too open ended.
by rubyfan 9y ago
Spring doesn’t seem as straightforward to me as I would hope. Play is similar, there is promise there but just too open ended.
- rubyfan 9y agoThe funny thing I see on the springboot quickstart page: Absolutely no code generation and no requirement for XML configuration And the very next thing is a maven xml config.
- ivan_gammel 9y agoIt's not a requirement to use Maven, so their statement is correct even in this extended sense. There's Gradle after all.
- rubyfan 9y agoYes it’s just an ironic presentation.
- AlexAMEEE 9y agoBy no XML, they mean that you don't have to do any configuration in xml files. You can declare everything as a bean. Example: // enabling ETAGS @Bean public Filter etagFilter() { return new ShallowEtagHeaderFilter(); } There is also the option to do many things in a yml file like you are used to from Rails.
- scalesolved 9y agoPlay is probably fine if you use Scala, the Java side is painful. I've worked with Play (Java version) for 3 years and we're moving to Spring Boot now, it's much simpler and stable (from a feature and framework perspective).