rtk7

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by rtk7 12y ago

   Haha! Thank you! I wasn't paying enough attention (or not enough coffee).
2. 2.▲
   by rtk7 12y ago

   Hehe, absolutely no. A 320 kpbs MP3 and .wav are hard to distinguish, but the high freq range is usually the one where things are missing, and the lows also but only if there are a lot deep sweeps and bass. If I wouldn't have a wav and
3. 3.▲
   by rtk7 12y ago

   Yes. What my concern about this is is actually the lower and higher frequencies in the mp3s. With these the loss was neglectable. I thought preserving the full range and quality was paramount with audio testing, but I'm not an expert o
4. 4.▲
   by rtk7 12y ago

   But these are mp3s, they're 44,1 kHz VBRs. How is this supposed to be accurate? Shouldn't these files be PCM .wav or at least .FLAC?