rsoto

24 ms·

181.
by rsoto 15y ago
>>Migrated stored user passwords to a safer format (from salted sha1 to bcrypt). I'm curious on how to do that? I'm guessing you add another field and wait for the user to log in and if it matches, you salt and hash the new passwor
182.
by rsoto 15y ago
>I saw a post long ago (i couldn't find :/) It seems the site is down, but here's archive.org's cache: http://web.archive.org/web/20110208212952/http://www.41latit... http://web.archive.org/web/20101223050944/http://www.41latit...
183.
by rsoto 15y ago
I have never got myself into the facebook train, and I haven't lost much. But what it's starting to annoy me are the widgets. While I'm aware it's a very nice source of traffic, this is getting out of hand and the reason is simple: the ifra
184.
by rsoto 15y ago
I don't agree with it. Chrome is awesome, granted, but it's tightly designed for making Google more money. Not that it's something wrong with it, but it's not useful from my perspective (that might or might not be correct). Let me explain y
185.
by rsoto 15y ago
Well, it's a demo, you'll be only allowed to advance to a few levels. That's the difference.
186.
by rsoto 15y ago
Judging from the URL, it seems like TC's mistake, altough OP just posted it as it is.
187.
by rsoto 15y ago
...Which those CDN provide support as well: https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js
188.
by rsoto 15y ago
I'm not sure it might work without flash, there's no way to copy and paste, at least aside from IE[1]. What I'm arguing is the fact that the widget is embedded. Without it, at least one crucial step will be added (switch back to the previou
189.
by rsoto 15y ago
The real question here is why is facebook embedding an untrusted widget. They should whitelist youtube, vimeo and all the major content providers and this issue is effectively gone. I'm real curious about the url facebook is embedding. If i
190.
by rsoto 15y ago
I haven't ditched Firefox for the totally opposite reason you are giving us. In Chrome, you type to search in the URL bar so it can go to Google's search results (and hence, giving them money). Firefox has two bars: one for search (the one
191.
by rsoto 15y ago
I was expecting a graphic illustration.
192.
by rsoto 15y ago
Well, yes, it works, but there isn't an upload process, so I thought the image is linked to your local drive-- which is useless. In closer inspection, the image gets transformed to a base64 encoding (data:image/gif;base64,[...]) which is us
193.
by rsoto 15y ago
Very interesting article, but what about the <menu> element, what's the difference between this and the <nav>?
194.
by rsoto 15y ago
This is obviously to code purists -- which I am. IMHO, it's way better to know what you're doing. They certainly aren't causing any harm, but we all have seen things like: <span class="title">Article title</span> And the guy
195.
by rsoto 15y ago
Fuck the ten-page pagination, full article in one page: http://www.extremetech.com/computing/90200-the-history-of-mo...
196.
by rsoto 15y ago
you should install adblock
197.
by rsoto 15y ago
On a side note, below the video was an error box because a misconfiguration of the live stream box. It says a lot about the current status of developing on the fb platform.
198.
by rsoto 15y ago
I think the cloaking was fixed long time ago. And Google IS being fooled-- that's why it is ranked on first on that query.
199.
by rsoto 15y ago
This is very weird. jQuery.it has the same PageRank as jQuery.com (8/10). This site dates back to 2007 [1] altough it started copying the jQuery site until 2009 [2]. It also has cloned the subdomains: http://dev.jquery.it/ and http://for
200.
by rsoto 15y ago
Nope. He wants to look frightened for some reason.
201.
by rsoto 15y ago
Edit: thanks to the two gentlemen that have invited me! I'd appreciate if you can invite me: ~~~@gmail.com
202.
by rsoto 15y ago
and glorified bookmarklets. Seriously, you can see the differences of the API installing the Web Developer Toolbar on both browsers. If you get used to work with it on Firefox and switch to the Chrome's version you'll notice you are missing
203.
by rsoto 15y ago
True, not middle click on Firefox, but ctrl+click. Also, the typography choice is awful http://i.imgur.com/lNV5U.png
204.
by rsoto 15y ago
You could animate after you've received all the data, then set the Y axis into the max of the values. Anyway, good job! Thanks for sharing.
205.
by rsoto 15y ago
I think there are bigger issues to fix on HN: - Everything is a table - <FONT> everywhere - URLs on self-posts doesn't convert into a link - Un-upvote/downvote
206.
by rsoto 15y ago
I've been using keyboard navigation in Firefox for years and haven't looked back. Head to options > advanced > general and check "search for text when I start typing". Now enjoy; look for a link you find interesting, type the name a
207.
by rsoto 15y ago
Wasn't pre-caching already on Firefox? https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Link_prefetching_FAQ I remember this had its controversy quite some time ago. I'm glad Chrome is taking it seriously, but I wonder what happened with the old implemen
208.
by rsoto 15y ago
Don't get me wrong. It's not about the money. It's about transparency. Maybe you didn't notify me because my account was inactive, but you had the data -- maybe I'd return one day and tried to use the app as usual, just to receive an error
209.
by rsoto 15y ago
It's sad that you alienize your current userbase. Without notice, you guys broke many applications outside the US. I was a client, the service was good. I stopped using it and came back two months ago, I bought additional credits, set up my
210.
by rsoto 15y ago
It has no AI, the croc's movement is scripted. CSS can do a lot more than changing style on mouse hover. Check out the pseudo-elements, the transitions, the :target selector.

More ›