rsoto

29 ms·

211.
by rsoto 15y ago
Bad article. There's no demo, the code is formatted by WP (“stylesheet” instead of "stylesheet") and the line numbers won't even match.
212.
by rsoto 15y ago
Google doesn't think that the search is broken, so they aren't looking for fixes. And even if they were, the +1 button would be a heaven-sent for spammers, so that's not the fix they're looking for.
213.
by rsoto 15y ago
Yeah, I'm also very confused. While I think it's a good idea to be pushing relases more often, this is way too often. Here's the about Firefox dialog http://i.imgur.com/cDbN1.png and the update request http://i.imgur.com/4SYRI.png
214.
by rsoto 15y ago
Actually, my Firefox it's advicing me to update. And I'm not on the nightly, developer or beta channel.
215.
by rsoto 15y ago
The lesson here: don't install shady addons, just as you aren't installing every damn toolbar out there. Also, this is enough to sue, isn't it?
216.
by rsoto 15y ago
Thanks for your response, but my question remains. Why would a entity as big as "the government" would invest in breaking one browser used by a minority (~10%) of users in the web? Wouldn't it be much easier to just compromise their Interne
217.
by rsoto 15y ago
I'm confused. Why would the government want to break Chrome? Also, if they are not going to release the exploit soon (especially to Google), why are you saying 'safer software for all'?
218.
by rsoto 15y ago
You type your password twice because you might make a mistake. Also, you can't copy anything from passwords fields.
219.
by rsoto 15y ago
Uh.. it still works. http://i.imgur.com/jQOwU.png
220.
by rsoto 15y ago
please don't split your articles. however, it was a good read. thanks.
221.
by rsoto 16y ago
Yes, because it's his public timeline. But you will not see @replies from people you are not following in your timeline.
222.
by rsoto 16y ago
I agree with you, but I'd rather deliver a distracting, cluttered resume than a boring one. Anyways, most of the time, the resumes tell you very little about the person. Delivering one that's different tells you more of what you can expect,
223.
by rsoto 16y ago
that would be a pretty cool idea
224.
by rsoto 16y ago
Thinkgeek: - Arsenic-based sea monkeys http://www.thinkgeek.com/interests/looflirpa/e8b9/ - Edible gummy iPhone cases http://www.thinkgeek.com/interests/looflirpa/e8ba/ - Playmobil Apple Store Playset http://www.thinkgeek.com/interests
225.
by rsoto 16y ago
What's up with the downvotes? I also feel like the best option to sign up to a twitter's competitor service is by NOT using twitter. The signup button goes to a "Internal Server Error" as described above. He wasn't bashing anyone.
226.
by rsoto 16y ago
You don't need the console.
227.
by rsoto 16y ago
Obviously they forgot that bing is part of MS. MS seem to be working very hard to clean their image. And a big part of it has to do with Bill Gates. However, their products aren't that great: hotmail still sucks, IE9 is a poor implementatio
228.
by rsoto 16y ago
Yours and the world's as well. I don't care how fast they claim to be now-- whether if it's true or not. reddit is down at the moment and I've been reloading like crazy for about 2 hours. I think there's a lesson to learn there.
229.
by rsoto 16y ago
I know some people that does. One time I installed Chrome in some friend's PC. He has used Firefox and despite he's not a technical person, he understands there is 'more' Internet than the blue E icon. Next time I know, he uninstalled it "t
230.
by rsoto 16y ago
Firefox has the option via the GUI, in the privacy tab, select custom settings for history and tick the first checkbox.
231.
by rsoto 16y ago
I just lost a little of respect from you guys with this comment.
232.
by rsoto 16y ago
I think their reasoning is that if you really want to delete something from the results, it has to be really bad. Hence, you'll likely not want to receive search results from that same site. But I'm no Matt Cutts. Btw, is the link showi
233.
by rsoto 16y ago
While it's a very good thing MS is endorsing this, they are very incongruent. They continuosly state that they love the web, that IE9 will deliver a more beautiful web and all that stuff. But here we are. We have a 10-year old browser that
234.
by rsoto 16y ago
nevertheless he's great. i've learned to be critic with the things i'm learning from the others and one thing is true: no one is going to be 100% wrong nor correct. there's something to learn from everyone.
235.
by rsoto 16y ago
I don't understand how they can defend that position. Yeah, it's their job and they might be very proud of their work, but they can't be that dumb. Haven't they learned the lesson? Everytime they try to come with something, the community ba
236.
by rsoto 16y ago
Having a big company behaving like a local one-- listening to the customer's opinions is really nice. However, this is a feature that Google actually had. Why did you remove it? I accept the Search Wiki was not particuarly a success[1], but
237.
by rsoto 16y ago
Whoa, that was pretty quick. Thanks!
238.
by rsoto 16y ago
Pretty interesting, but it seems like it doesn't work with FF4 b8. Since it uses an iframe, it'll be interesting to know what happens on a site that detects that.
239.
by rsoto 16y ago
I'm using FF4b8 and the status bar is in "off", but you can easily turn it on. It's not removed entirely, it's just hidden. And that's what I love about Mozilla. Even if they remove it entirely, there will always be an extension to put it b
240.
by rsoto 16y ago
Yeah, I like HN just as it and understand this is a design made by a coder, but using tables is just plain wrong IMHO.

More ›