Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rsingel
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
211.
▲
Why the gun industry should support net neutrality
(guns.com)
41 points
by
rsingel
9y ago
|
30 comments
212.
▲
Expect Fewer Great Startups If the FCC Kills Net Neutrality
(wired.com)
5 points
by
rsingel
9y ago
|
0 comments
213.
▲
by
rsingel
9y ago
Last I saw, this wasn't actually being counted vs. datacaps for either the roaming user or the host.
214.
▲
The FCC Wants to Repeal Net Neutrality but Congress Would Pay the Price
(wired.com)
2 points
by
rsingel
9y ago
|
0 comments
215.
▲
The FCC Has Always Defended Net Neutrality. Why Stop Now?
(fortune.com)
1 points
by
rsingel
9y ago
|
0 comments
216.
▲
by
rsingel
9y ago
This is not the case. Also there's no net neutrality legislation -- there's an order from the FCC that's been in place since 2015. And the law you are referring to isn't from the 1930s. It's the 1996 Telecom Act. He
217.
▲
by
rsingel
9y ago
Perhaps the city is telling you something. When I got a job that didn't require daily commuting, I quickly racked up parking tickets and decided it was cheaper and less stress to bike/take cabs/zipcar, etc. Now that Lyft/
218.
▲
by
rsingel
10y ago
All static site projects evolve into recreating WordPress.
219.
▲
by
rsingel
10y ago
And yet this company's blog post has two ads blocked by AdBlock and runs Disqus as its comment section which is a web-wide data collector and ad service.
220.
▲
Infinite Scroll Is (Usually) Just a Bad Recommendation System
(blog.contextly.com)
2 points
by
rsingel
10y ago
|
0 comments
221.
▲
How to Illegally Sway an Election with Sponsored Content
(medium.com)
1 points
by
rsingel
10y ago
|
0 comments
222.
▲
by
rsingel
11y ago
That's still not "settled." That's one state court ruling. Other states could rule differently. A federal court in that district could rule differently. That said, if your threat model involves anyone technically sophist
223.
▲
by
rsingel
11y ago
It is not settled law in the U.S. whether being forced to handover a password is "contempt of court" or actually self-incrimination protected by the Fifth Amendment. Wiretaps ordered into the U.S. phone and internet networks via
224.
▲
by
rsingel
11y ago
Secure from whom? A school IT admin? An abusive spouse? A kiddie with a wifi packet sniffer? From hackers going after email accounts? There are lots of threat models that CryptoCat was useful against; and in the long run, CryptoCat was righ
225.
▲
by
rsingel
11y ago
I thought the same thing when I saw the title. And then I saw the byline: Cade Metz. And I read the story. Metz understands tech. Metz got this story right. So while you may be right that many AI articles are smoke-and-mirrors from journali
226.
▲
by
rsingel
11y ago
Thanks for checking that. I wish the mods would replace the link, since rewarding original reporting makes more of it, and rewarding aggregation makes more of that.
227.
▲
by
rsingel
11y ago
Why is this a link to an aggregation piece by TechCrunch, rather than the original reported story by Dallas Morning News? http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/northwest-dall...
228.
▲
by
rsingel
12y ago
This is yet another good argument for TextSecure and RedPhone, which don't depend on the SIM card encryption. https://whispersystems.org/
229.
▲
by
rsingel
12y ago
I just tried this out. I love the simplicity of the homescreen and the simple volume toggle is great. 2 things: 1. The coffee shop has the Joe Walsh song The Joker in the background. It's a ridiculously catchy song and I found it very
230.
▲
by
rsingel
12y ago
This is largely political saber rattling. AT&T's best arguments are going to be procedural. If FCC gets past arguments it didn't dot the i's, then this will go to the Supreme Court where AT&T and Verizon will get wall
231.
▲
by
rsingel
12y ago
They are. If they just deliver packets then they are clearly Title II. Last time the FCC did this (2004/5), the ISPs claimed that their homepages and email service and DNS made them not "telecommunications". Well, Gmail, Open
232.
▲
by
rsingel
12y ago
That's not true. The only carrier banned from blocking tethering is Verizon -- and that applies only to phones using the C Block spectrum. That's because when the FCC sold that spectrum it came with strong net neutrality rules att
233.
▲
Top 15 Stories Published from the 1940s-50s That Did Well on Hacker News
(blog.contextly.com)
1 points
by
rsingel
12y ago
|
0 comments
234.
▲
Hacker News’s Favorite Stories from the 1940s-50s (Annotated)
(contextly.com)
9 points
by
rsingel
12y ago
|
0 comments
235.
▲
Vox and Outbrain: A Tale of Two Publishing Worlds
(contextly.com)
3 points
by
rsingel
12y ago
|
0 comments
236.
▲
by
rsingel
12y ago
Oh, no! Pointing out that a corporate power structure is overwhelming white and male is so unfair to those that are white and male. I used to be this author's editor and that lede is very Wired. Sad to see this "tone policing"
237.
▲
by
rsingel
12y ago
Sure, but once you've licensed the images under a certain CC license, you can't really go back. Yahoo will probably obey the user choice (as I think they should) but legally aren't under any obligation to do so.
238.
▲
by
rsingel
12y ago
Ryan Singel here from Contextly (my co-founder wrote the blog post). I think you are absolutely right on with the insight that stellar content is missed by readers for many reasons. We are part of a solution for publishers that want to have
239.
▲
by
rsingel
12y ago
Wait, this is a link to a blog that reposted, in full, a story from National Journal that this guy didn't write. Could someone please change the link to the original? http://www.nationaljournal.com/tech/the-fbi-s-s
240.
▲
by
rsingel
12y ago
There's no such thing as news that doesn't involve social or political issues. There is news that doesn't challenge implicit assumptions -- but that doesn't make it non-political.
More ›