Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rrobukef
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
271.
▲
by
rrobukef
8y ago
Thank you. It's interesting to see the explosion of states. You could add a cache (per search depth) to deduplicate states again. It will reduce small cycles and the used memory is easier to control. Kudos for the encoding. 0.7 bits pe
272.
▲
by
rrobukef
8y ago
Yet it's also about solving a problem, that goes out of memory. If there is an equal algorithm that doesn't go out of memory isn't this a valid criticism? The author probably spent some time writing the code, modifying and ex
273.
▲
by
rrobukef
8y ago
This was my thought too, but I don't want to assume: he cites enough standard but specific sources that he should know the general search algorithms. Also I think that since he doesn't mention standard depth first search at all it
274.
▲
by
rrobukef
8y ago
Additionally, while Coca-Cola is a company, Riseup is a non-profit, Openlab / onionfriends are also non-profits. They have volunteers, with a mindset shared by both groups. I assume volunteers will often help at multiple non-profits (s
275.
▲
by
rrobukef
8y ago
Oh, so ロリコン is lolicon? Thank you. I can't read japanese. Even a direct translation would be useful, because even google translate doesn't translate both as child pornography. The assertion in the text that both are translated as
276.
▲
by
rrobukef
8y ago
But what is the actual difference between the two? Is the second more extreme? Is one drawn and the other real? Or is the second drawn but based on real models ( like the fine)? Is it the difference between nude and naked? Pixiv is generall
277.
▲
by
rrobukef
8y ago
"Child ingested...We took a magnetic resonance image." But i should hope that medical specialists use the abbreviated mri.
278.
▲
by
rrobukef
8y ago
Or it's wishful thinking / placebo. The mind is very good at deceiving itself.
279.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
But no count of how often the hash is used. Counting bloom filters are till a bit harder to implement.
280.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
Yet I don't have driver issues, codec issues, bluescreens anymore. I don't need to fail compiling a kernel. I can watch a movie without downloading it, I can store a high quality picture on a floppy disc, maybe two. Computers ente
281.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
Or people learn and see that they can make a happy path of 90%. Or the business removes an implemented unhappy path of 5% that fails 50% of the time. Or the business introduces a new unhappy path to go with the times or times just change an
282.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
You seem to keep arguing that your examples are not causal but only correlated. Because something does not happen 100% of the time does not mean it's not causal. Smoking causes cancer, not everyone that smokes actually gets cancer. I&#
283.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
Let's say a true predictor is causal. Because each example you give is causal: age causes defects, smoking causes sickness, alcohol impairs, religion causes behaviour. Using hotmail versus gmail will not cause something -- private doma
284.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
Then it needs to be clear what the effects of the choice are, so you can choose. Then the effect will disappear because it's not a true predictor. Each of your examples have a clear explanation, hotmail doesn't.
285.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
Mostly, which is enough to attract lots and lots of amateurs and high-schoolers. Then there's also the standardization committees and special frameworks. Also the two most popular browsers are multiplatform. You can write a website and
286.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
No, mining does not generate value except supporting Bitcoin. Prime numbers (not mining) also only have cryptographic value if they aren't known to anybody else. Losing the nifty usecases for gold would plummet the price. Luckily were
287.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
I don't think there is any different value to that of Bitcoin. However I think they provide a service (money transmitting) better than existing competitors. I also think that altcoins don't compete with Bitcoin because Bitcoin is
288.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
But how does it keep it's value stable? How does a store of value weather a small panic when the hope and excitement has died down? When the hodl has stopped because everybody is tired, living their lives, and using Bitcoin. Bitcoin is
289.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
A facade wrapping the representation would sufficiently transform the paradigm?
290.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
in addition, each had an separate graphics api. Which was imperative, not as stable nor backward compatible nor as battlefield-tested as html. Each keyword is a difference between all previous approaches versus html. And sometimes/oft
291.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
If you don't pay for them and need a product is it really a purchase?
292.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
But there is a cost for each bit. It's amortized. Because at some point you need a second cd, which increases fuel a tiny bit, and lowers the amirtized cost per bit. At some point you need a bigger truck and then a second truck, sudden
293.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
I don't see how transactions made in 2016 (2014 even?) are part of malicious FUD, they exist and are verifiable. You could assume malice, yet their hypothesis is somewhat testable: if it is uninitialised memory you should have private
294.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
Yes, i think a lot of the stupid bugs would be avoided. I don't think this was a stupid enough bug that formal methods would always catch.
295.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
It is just moving the goalposts. The formally verified contract is only as good as the assertions proven. Look at WPA2, it was formally verified against 'most' attacks.
296.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
I had a different process. I started with thinking (Basic, assembler and Java) that different paradigms were uniquely suited for different problems. Learning logic programming and functional programming changed this notion. It's possib
297.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
A sybill attack would greatly increase the probability. And has cheatingly other gains.
298.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
But you can't say it is inflation because purchasing power didn't decrease. Theoretically the value of the old coin will be (Y-1)/Y so everybodies wealth increased by 1. If it's greater than 1 good! You can even call it
299.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
But since everybody got both they didn't lose anything: they got some jstanleycoins too (unless you were lending dollars, then you may not get them both back). So the wealth/spending power didn't decrease, there was no inflat
300.
▲
by
rrobukef
9y ago
There is an easy circumvention for this: make a digital passport coupled with the distrusted root CA. To have any official means manually installing the root CA.
More ›