rrmm

18 ms·

151.
by rrmm 6y ago
See this seems really weird because Giant Steps is super simple and makes sense to me, inherently. And I can't step back from that and see it otherwise except to acknowledge that your point is probably true. But that is purely an in
152.
by rrmm 6y ago
Wasn't exim the default mailer for many distros?
153.
by rrmm 6y ago
Some stuff based on pentatonic scales (blues) would probably make sense. From what I recall it's almost universal in different cultures. Bobby Mcferrin has a fun demo about this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ne6tB2K
154.
by rrmm 6y ago
Ahh you are right, thanks for the correction. D looks like upper tolerable dosage is around 4000IU/day for 9+ years old. Some studies apparently see overt toxicity after several months of 50000IU/day dosages.
155.
by rrmm 6y ago
I went to the AVR as soon as I found it. Much nicer.
156.
by rrmm 6y ago
I've been seeing some odd down vote choices too. Maybe there's just a lot of tension in the air for people these days?
157.
by rrmm 6y ago
Same for me. Usually just because of the ubiquity of gcc and its ilk.
158.
by rrmm 6y ago
Implementing a compiler for some language at some point in your life is a great project. It will really teach you a lot of deep down information on what's going on under the hood. I took a compilers course in grad school and it was a
159.
by rrmm 6y ago
43 is a reasonable number to start with (it gives you some power wrt sample variance, but you have to pay attention to randomization). It might give you some information if the intervention were really, really bad for patients or really rea
160.
by rrmm 6y ago
Yeah this seems like it'd be much easier to roll out on wide spread basis than HCQ. With an appropriate caution about dosage consulting a doc before making any changes, they're all water soluble. That there statement about the li
161.
by rrmm 6y ago
Probably the same thing can be said about shakespeare as well. We just have a very wildly different context than its contemporaneous viewers. And our culture and language as it is now is hugely influenced by all of shakespeare's work
162.
by rrmm 6y ago
The hard part is I don't think we hear harmony the same way. The way we hear music, what makes sense about music, is a function of the music we've listened to in our culture as we have matured. I don't think we can really ev
163.
by rrmm 6y ago
Thanks for the info.
164.
by rrmm 6y ago
In our defense we thought it would stop the bullet time camera effects.
165.
by rrmm 6y ago
Ahh, ok thanks for the info.
166.
by rrmm 6y ago
Ooof. I've done .net dev in the past, but most of my stuff is not in that space anymore. Are these the mono people working on this?
167.
by rrmm 6y ago
I definitely started out as a strong gtk advocate. But these days I wouldn't have qualms about using QT if it were the right fit for the project.
168.
by rrmm 6y ago
I'm not sure I'd be down with it if every application become an Electron one. But the browser does have some significant benefits since the people who make the browser did all the heavy lifting for you. Chromium started out using
169.
by rrmm 6y ago
XFCE is where I landed and it works well for me. I'm really thankful for the people that work on those efforts.
170.
by rrmm 6y ago
Yup. I did extremely minor work on gtk, pygtk, and dynamic bindings, and agree with you regarding the alienation. It was especially hard with the attitudes on the mailing list. Are you involved in any toolkit stuff these days? EDIT: hahah
171.
by rrmm 6y ago
Yeah...yeah.
172.
by rrmm 6y ago
I don't know if they even have that data for that length of time. You might find some info in literature regarding the difference in UV exposure in areas under the ozone hole vs areas of more normal exposure. As an aside, don't g
173.
by rrmm 6y ago
Ok so I think the parameter you want to be looking for is the temperature (not necessarily at altitude) that results in some particular amount (ppmv) of water vapor at altitude. With the understanding that the hotter it is at altitude the
174.
by rrmm 6y ago
> I would think pumping out tons of ozone is significantly easier than removing atmospheric CO2 or, you know, burning less carbon(how absurd, right?). That reminds me of the Simpsons episode where they bring in a serious of increasingly
175.
by rrmm 6y ago
I think it is important to state, that this isn't some established fact. And it's not a thing that this one paper could 'establish' as fact.
176.
by rrmm 6y ago
It's a single paper in a journal. This is how science works: they are putting out their hypothesis and the data and their conclusions. It doesn't mean they're 'right' (regardless of the certitude of the HN headline
177.
by rrmm 6y ago
Good catch. Advances I gather is their open-access journal? Not necessarily any worse I would think, but yeah not for the big impact papers.
178.
by rrmm 6y ago
High-altitude planes dispensing ozone chemtrails!
179.
by rrmm 6y ago
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/337/6096/835/tab-pdf That's the ref in the paper. It's a bit confusing because they're looking at chemical processes taking place at 15-20km altitud
180.
by rrmm 6y ago
I know right. "Hey I see you like worrying about stuff...well, how about these apples!" Scientists really need to learn how to keep it to themselves for like a year or two. /s

More ›