rpwverheij

9 ms·

61.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
yes, this is a good question. I still have to implement drag and drop in a react project, and it seems the way to go is do this all through state? Which means none of the existing drag and drop solutions will work (any DOM manipulation with
62.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
View, Text and Image should be cross-platform, and might even be targeted for web at some point. And more components could be. But they emphasised that you should be able to _choose_ how much code you want to re-use cross-platform, and that
63.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
Is 'tomorrows' video online yet? Can't seem to find it, or has it not been tomorrow yet? :)
64.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
cause I'm starting to excell in javascript and never even touched C#?
65.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
Ah yes, true. I've always thaught of it as understandable that they focus on Visual Studio, but I too would much appriciate it if they would push that a bit less. I did try the free version of VS when I started with TS, but I didnt pre
66.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
It's the first time I heard that, though I admit I'm not really actively involved in any type of TS community. All I've been in contact with are the TS releases and blogpost from the TS development team, for which I can only
67.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
I agree, I really don't like having to bind all the methods manually, and I'm not sure I agree with the argument of causing confusion. Being used to having to bind and finding out it's being done automatically in React is jus
68.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
I'm using Typescript + React for quite a big project, and I'm really happy with it (and even more happy with how things will work soon with this release). True, not being able to use JSX is a really big minus. Personally I'm
69.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
After quite some consideration I chose to convert my ActionScript3 project to TypeScript. I knew I had to move away from flash for a while, and personally I really prefer to code big framework-like projects with static typing, so I gave it
70.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
this is really helpful. I was looking for a short from-typical-react-to-flux-example compact enough to read through at once. I get it much better now, and actually I have already a framework with models with 'global' state and use
71.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
I'm using react quite a lot, but with my own API / storage solutions. So far I'm not really familiar with flux, and also with this, just quickly looking at it, I don't understand if/why I would need it. I can't
72.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
completely agree. I didn't even get it was a node replacement. A spork of node? What is that? I might be missing some tech vocabulary, or just some native-english understanding. But the wording could be much more clear.
73.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
thank you pg
74.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
Elon musk's companies are doing well now, but and he and his companies were really on the edge failing not too long ago, so "can't fail" is not really a good way of putting it. http://uk.businessinsider.com&#x
75.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
pretty cool feature. I'm quite pleasantly surprised by the rapid devlopment and quick support on SO questions by the TS team.
76.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
didn't know about the tractor beams. That's pretty cool
77.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
my thought exactly. Unless we see some big breakthrough in Ghz for single cores, more cores will come, and be properly used, in time.
78.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
Awesome, just what I needed for a react project I'm starting on. thank you.
79.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
Just downloaded it and gave it a try. I've been using chrome for development for a long time and I must say this looks really good and I'd really like to switch cause I like the firefox image/mission much more. However I&#x27
80.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
this is a nice start of a cool and handy tool. As someone who recently got into React, browserify and uses less by default, I really apreciate people making libraries like this and will probably try using this at some point. Yes, as others
81.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
same. very interesting article, and interesting to hear about the distribution between income from adds and people paying to remove adds. But I for one would be also interested to get a rough estimation of what finding a nice little niche s
82.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
"Subscribing to data events throughout your application [..] creates a huge overhead" So could I do without event listeners when using Immutable data? Say I have a view listening to data changes with event listeners... could I not
83.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
to put what rtfeldman said in code: var map = Immutable.Map({a:1, b:2, c:3}); var map2 = map.set('b', 20); map.get('b'); // 2 map2.get('b'); // 20
84.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
interesting! will look this up again when I have one of the described problems. In the meanwhile, I'll push an update to my brain: not everything related to tables is old / bad!
85.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
wow, just wow. amazing stuff Steven. I've been working on a framework for very easy data structure creation and instance management in a 3D environment. I was building it in 3D flash first, and have tried to build exactly those kind of
86.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
It is a framework for the semantic web. It allows on the fly setup of data structures which you can then instantly use. It comes with pre installed datatypes and visualisations (both 2d and 3d), but user made datatypes can also be shared wi
87.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
I can only give you some advice with what has worked for me. I'm 29 now, I've been programming something I'm very passionate about for the past 4 years, earning just enough on the side to work on that. Last year, it took a bi
88.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
Does anyone know why so relativly many attacks come from the Netherlands? After running this for about 5 minutes it is the number one origin of attack at the moment.
89.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
they do exist though
90.
by rpwverheij 12y ago
true, though now that it's here, moms still like it when you remember and call or visit on that specific day.

More ›