rowaway93

7 ms·

1.
by rowaway93 8y ago
If you have to pay royalties to use a digital font, it stands to reason you have to pay royalties to the keepers of information. Why that's elsevier et al all I don't know, but they are is the only logical conclusion.
2.
by rowaway93 8y ago
Everything? They publish basically extended abstracts, nothing that could be confidently reproduced, nor code ... or I just don't know how to read it and find supplemental material. There's a lot in the bibliography. Really just a
3.
by rowaway93 8y ago
I have a hunch that the nominally feminine gender is rather one of subjunction, not to say subjugation. Der Himmel -> Die Sonne -> Das Wetter. Der Tag -> Die Nacht -> Das Jahr. Der Mond -> Die Sterne -> Das Pantheon ... OK
4.
by rowaway93 8y ago
Totally opaque to whether that's "lego's" or "legos" and children in general probably don't care for an overzealous syntactic classification of single morphemes either. Is "gimme the lego over there&q
5.
by rowaway93 8y ago
dat- is the stem, I suppose, -um is a grammatical ending. Data simply suits the English ear better because it's close to the nominal suffix -er. How do you like this dater point?
6.
by rowaway93 8y ago
This is the most ridiculous thing I ever heard, is it april fools day? I read about "amper's and". Although I have no idea what an amper is, if memory serves the whole thing is related to merchant short hand, but it cannot g
7.
by rowaway93 8y ago
the parents idea is totally bonkers, who needs abostrophes anyway ...
8.
by rowaway93 8y ago
> Mathematics education is in an unacceptable state it's not halting?
9.
by rowaway93 8y ago
> which is among the worst of all sciences in evidentiary practices Linguistics is worse: It's quite literally based on hearsay. Edit: I think that's relevant. Perhaps mathematical skill is diametrically opposed to linguistic f