rory096

46 ms·

391.
by rory096 10y ago
This was in fact a major point of the drivers' case: >The drivers note that each of the terms in Exemption F that indisputably names an exempt activity — “canning, processing, preserving,” and so forth on through “packing” — is a ge
392.
by rory096 10y ago
Note that it's just using a t.co link, which is the only WSJ workaround that still seems to work. https://t.co/aQSNPqZSZ3
393.
by rory096 10y ago
That's the descriptor on his Twitter: >Weekend Meteorologist/News Reporter for Fox29 and News 4 SA. https://twitter.com/MikeHernandezTV
394.
by rory096 10y ago
FYI, your account has been dead for 2272 days.
395.
by rory096 10y ago
Site's intermittent. Here's a copy: We are delighted to be funding the ACLU as a non-profit[0] in our Winter 2017 batch. The ACLU has always been important, but has a particularly important role[1] right now. We are honored to be
396.
by rory096 10y ago
One wonders if we want to encourage him to tick off these boxes.
397.
by rory096 10y ago
This was an impressive HN experiment, at the very least. 14 comments now and only one person even glanced at the article.
398.
by rory096 10y ago
Looks like that page got killed in the Waymo switch. Archive.org is missing the PDFs, but it looks like they still work if you follow the archived links straight to the URL. [0] https://web.archive.org/web/2016101605072
399.
by rory096 10y ago
They released a video a month later (3 weeks ago) with a much more challenging route: https://www.tesla.com/videos/autopilot-self-driving-hardware...
400.
by rory096 10y ago
The patents in question seem to consist of essentially just pictures. Can anyone more familiar with design patents clarify whether there are more specifics beyond what Google Patents and the USPTO website show, or if this is all there is to
401.
by rory096 10y ago
>NatureIsFuckingLit: 0.0% Something's up here. That subreddit requires users to post emojis. [0] https://www.reddit.com/r/natureisfuckinglit/wiki/rules
402.
by rory096 10y ago
>Only 11% of people know this secret. Sounds like a feature discoverability problem. Does Heinz have a UX team?
403.
by rory096 10y ago
There's no ignition source normally — the liquid oxygen isn't under as much pressure, it's just sitting in the tank under nominal conditions. The idea is that the solid oxygen formed underneath the top layers of the carbon ov
404.
by rory096 10y ago
That other thread's link was changed from: https://slackhq.com/dear-microsoft-8d20965d2849
405.
by rory096 10y ago
That's head -up display. And while I'm at it, it's not "line of site" either.
406.
by rory096 10y ago
>So, Sam, who do you support? He's made no secret of this. http://blog.samaltman.com/trump
407.
by rory096 10y ago
This is thought to be the Raptor prototype SpaceX is developing under a USAF contract for a methalox Falcon 9 upper stage concept.[0] Thus it's about the size of a Merlin 1D-Vac. Nobody is claiming otherwise. [0] http://www.
408.
by rory096 10y ago
For those who aren't already aware, tomorrow (Tuesday 9/27) at 1:30pm CDT (18:30 UTC) SpaceX will be revealing their Mars colonization plans in full at the International Astronautical Congress. The live stream will be available he
409.
by rory096 10y ago
>(maybe this is why there's so many 3 Michelin stars in Japan) You may be interested in this recent reddit thread about Japanese French cuisine. https://www.reddit.com/r/anime/comments/537bio/spoi
410.
by rory096 10y ago
Source? Estimates I see for the Manhattan Project from a quick google range from .25% to .41% of GDP. [0] https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34645.pdf [1] http://mitchellhowe.blogspot.com/2006
411.
by rory096 10y ago
Actually they specifically plan to load astronauts before fueling begins. If they're in the capsule the launch escape system (LES)[1] can propel them away from any on-pad disaster; not so if they're still walking across the gant
412.
by rory096 10y ago
This is what user-specific settings are for.
413.
by rory096 10y ago
You're not reading closely, unless your claim is that disagreement between "disagree" and "strongly disagree" is meaningful. Only 5% of respondents agreed that export-increasing policies are inherently worthwhile,
414.
by rory096 10y ago
Who told you economists can't agree? See this IGM economists poll (note that 'uncertains' largely pertain to specific exceptions or arguing that focus on trade balances doesn't make sense in the first place) http:/
415.
by rory096 10y ago
> FWIW in June of last year, Obama allied with Senate Republicans, beating his own party, to get TPP fast tracked, meaning that the vote will be all or nothing, up or down, This is true. A supermajority in Congress chose to preemptively
416.
by rory096 10y ago
But it's not secret. Read it. https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/tran...
417.
by rory096 10y ago
No. It's a deal negotiated between twelve parties with different interests. The public/Congress get ample opportunity to review the completed deal and decide if it's worthwhile, just not access to the minute details of the ne
418.
by rory096 10y ago
To expound on this, "by the time the documents are finalized, it will be signed before the ink of the text is dry" is typical FUD from anti-TPP people who've never bothered reading anything on the subject except other anti-TP
419.
by rory096 10y ago
The article is from April 2015. And they were quite correct – Warren did not declare her candidacy (or even come close to doing so).
420.
by rory096 10y ago
They show up for me. Here's an imgur album. http://imgur.com/a/DGizu

More ›