This was in fact a major point of the drivers' case: >The drivers note that each of the terms in Exemption F that indisputably names an exempt activity — “cann

This was in fact a major point of the drivers' case: >The drivers note that each of the terms in Exemption F that indisputably names an exempt activity — “canning, processing, preserving,” and so forth on through “packing” — is a gerund. By, contrast, “distribution” is not. And neither is “shipment.” In fact, those are the only non-gerund nouns in the exemption, other than the ones that name various foods. [0] http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca1/16-1901/16-1901-2017-03-13.html http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca1/16-...