ropejumper

6 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by ropejumper 2y ago

   Fair point! I think it's just a different way of expression, and both are valuable in their own way.
2. 62.▲
   by ropejumper 2y ago

   My favorite simple example of this is exclusive "we". It's not a thing in most languages, but it allows a level of passive aggressiveness that you can't achieve without it. Saying "we're going without you"
3. 63.▲
   by ropejumper 2y ago

   I admit it's really cool, but it's not a good fit for a landing page IMO. Would be great if it was behind a "demo" button or something. Though maybe I'm not the target audience.
4. 64.▲
   by ropejumper 2y ago

   Can you give concrete examples of what you're talking about? I'm struggling to understand your point.
5. 65.▲
   by ropejumper 2y ago

   That would be correct, and it also has a couple of interesting consequences. He liked to brag about how he can do however many millions of context switches per second; not entirely sure how valuable that is but it's fun. I think this a
6. 66.▲
   by ropejumper 2y ago

   I agree. What I like about TempleOS is that Terry wasn't afraid to make something new and unique, even though it was completely incompatible with everything else. DolDoc is such a cool idea. Not a unique one, but you don't find ma