Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
roosterdawn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
31.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
> Yeah, but pip and venv don’t leave me impressed, so please elaborate why those are better. Maybe you misspoke, but whether you are left impressed or not is your opinion. What is factual is that these tools are the ecosystem's defa
32.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
> But if company goes 'remote' much more work becomes outsourcing worthy. Again, there's a difference between "outsourcing worthy" and "can reliably outsourced for enough cost savings for the whole thing to
33.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
> Edit: Wow. Downvote in five seconds. Really makes you think how much effort people are putting into processing the words I wrote. What is there to process besides you making a strawman and injecting flat politically polarized tropes an
34.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
> What globalization did to manufacturing jobs, remote work will do to many service jobs. This is bait. It's taken as a given rather than a hypothesis to be proven, which invalidates most of this post for me. Issues with the analogy
35.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
You read my mind. This is awesome. Wonder how hard it'd be to DIY a smartphone and go from there.
36.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
As it pertains to statecraft, what is the point of bringing up "insurrections"? It just seems like a pedantic red herring to avoid discussing war. Insurrections are either aborted attempts to start wars and brutally suppressed, or
37.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
I don't think this logic applied to humans actually is inaccurate. For much of human history, extended family cohabitation was the norm, and the standard American nuclear was a radical, almost unimaginable idea. Most animals operate on
38.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
This should really be the pinned comment, as it does tell you everything you need to know. You've always had to move somewhere more expensive/with a heavier tech center gravity to have your career take off whether it's in ter
39.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
Because you, the laborer, begin as a fungible commodity to a company that very much operates on a short-term, quarterly basis. But with that said, it's certainly possible that Facebook will need to functionally do as you described and
40.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
A thorough reading of history shows that violent uprisings are de facto _what_ is effective, and certainly in post-industrial modern times. Empires cede control of territory when they become too expensive to maintain. Usually, that is in te
41.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
> The cynical part of me thinks all this "WFH Permanently" initiative is just a disguise for companies to start lowering cost for entry to mid-level IC positions by hiring from areas with much cheaper CoL. This isn't cynic
42.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
Oil. You can probably connect the dots from there.
43.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
> people today scroll through their feed where in one instant they are reading an article about war crimes in South America committed by the U.S. and in the next instant what Kylie Jenner wore to the MET gala Doesn't this completely
44.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
Upvoted because you ask a great question. I'm just speculating here, but here are a couple points for further questioning: 1) How many people transfer to rather than from the Europe or India office? I'd wager that it's mostly
45.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
Remote positions are not monolithic. Some are highly selective and highly compensated. Others are the opposite. If you're looking at a random cross section of the global remote opportunity pool, you're likely going to see reversio
46.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
Simple concept, but it hits me right in the nostalgia, presumably as intended. Very well done.
47.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
There was a relatively viral tweet I saw a few weeks ago saying "Gen Z career options: Fulfillment Center worker or OnlyFans" with gendered undertones. For what it's worth, though, while less common, it's not that rare t
48.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
If you only meant the statement as a rhetorical device or devil's advocate then the second part doesn't really apply to you. For what it's worth, I do think there's value there, so here's how I would have phrased th
49.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
Wow. Talk about solving the real problems! I'm not sure if this has been an issue yet, but how do you QC masks from known good manufacturers to make sure quality doesn't slip?
50.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
> But we're specifically talking about someone who already has a job at Gitlab here and how the CoL adjustment affects them and the weird situation it creates, so the competitiveness doesn't really matter, they've already
51.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
Yeah I get it, I just don't buy it. Move to a higher COL area, and you tend to get access to a market with expanded labor demand. So, it's $HIGHER_COL_MARKET_EMPLOYER (or $HIGHER_COL_MARKET if you catch my drift) increases your wa
52.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
> I wasn’t asserting or claiming one way or the other. You verbatim asked "why pay $200k for a software engineer same talent can live outside of the bay area and can do with 1/3rd of the salary" and you got a response. If
53.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
A fellow individual of taste, I see. But honestly, I would really enjoy seeing more of the latter type of think-piece in all seriousness. I genuinely do believe that the field as a whole would benefit from a bias towards $BORING_DEPENDABLE_
54.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
I think you have things the wrong way around. If you are able to pass the interview bar for a selective company that pays market rate in a tier-1 tech city, then yes, you get to move. But, if you don't, you won't get the job wheth
55.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
> when the same talent can live outside of the bay area and can do with 1/3rd of the salary What makes you think this is true and not just a post-hoc rationalization? Let me put it this way: offer that salary worldwide and you will
56.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
Lost it at $AN_ENGINEER_TOOK_A_MYTHOLOGY_CLASS. I guess it's not as bad as $A_FOUNDER_WHO_TOOK_AYAHUASCA or $THE_VC_WHO_SPEAKS_ONLY_IN_RAP_QUOTES_AND_METAPHORS.
57.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
Did anyone else read this and, experiences colored by startups, immediately begin thinking about an analogous effect in startup organizational developmental dynamics? Anyways, to be more on topic, I read this quote from the article: "B
58.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
Not sure why you're getting downvoted and I 100% agree. And furthermore, I would be very surprised if your point is not eventually echoed by senior leadership, at least internally. This is the only correct course of action, and based o
59.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
The problem I have with your argument is that depending on one's viewpoint, this could be a feature and not a bug. Historically, humans have had some conception of reasonable ranges of rates to charge for interest and purchases to unde
60.
▲
by
roosterdawn
6y ago
I agree with your criticism in that the form and tone really do get in the way of a clear communication of his point. But I don't think it negates that he does have a point, which is that IQ is "scientistic" rather than scien
More ›