ronsor

7 ms·

121.
by ronsor 4mo ago
They don't have the political will because doing (1) and (2) would result in the removal of whatever politicians approved it.
122.
by ronsor 4mo ago
Those are the exceptions that prove the rule. It's very difficult for US or Western companies in general to do business in China without opaque restrictions, corruptions, and share ownership hoops. If the US is playing games, then it&#
123.
by ronsor 4mo ago
I don't want anyone being punished. I want everyone to stop acting stupid. I would've much preferred if Dario hadn't run his mouth so much.
124.
by ronsor 4mo ago
They got the "leopards ate my face" ending.
125.
by ronsor 4mo ago
This arrangement is already dubiously legal. The government is already being sued over the Fable incident with Anthropic. No amount of rules can stop people who are willing to break them. Only enforcement can.
126.
by ronsor 4mo ago
> "British Cockney spoken by an 8 year old female with a slight Chinese accent" This is already the case. The voice acting industry has inertia, and many union contracts have minimum hiring quotas. In practice, if you consider
127.
by ronsor 4mo ago
Two and a half years and still not complete? That's ridiculous.
128.
by ronsor 4mo ago
The solution is for the government to pay the actual cost of the regulations instead of making the property owner eat most of it. The reality is either you (the policymaker) find it important enough to bear the cost or it's not importa
129.
by ronsor 4mo ago
These kinds of groups (and apps such as Tea) are always litigation magnets. Not too surprising.
130.
by ronsor 4mo ago
Normal adults demand honesty. > but the README His stated objections would not be read as "I will try to sabotage you" by a normal person.
131.
by ronsor 4mo ago
That's the real problem. No one can predict the upper bound of what he'll do for the sake of "the right thing", and his specific concept of it goes beyond relatively universal principles, so the risk of relying on his wo
132.
by ronsor 4mo ago
$6000 of usage in three days???
133.
by ronsor 4mo ago
The default orientation of Americans toward government is already skepticism and distrust. The average person is questioning "why did you ever like the government in the first place?"
134.
by ronsor 4mo ago
> Those who are under attack happen to also be the biggest copyrighter holders, so this would open up a new avenue of attack. Don't threaten me with a good time
135.
by ronsor 4mo ago
If you merely get feedback from a human, are they now a co-author?
136.
by ronsor 4mo ago
A WASM browser is cool for general portability reasons. Right now porting browsers to bespoke targets is a major PITA, even for WebKit.
137.
by ronsor 4mo ago
I'm sure millions of people will rearrange their lives in due consideration of your morality overlord status.
138.
by ronsor 4mo ago
That's fine, but all that means is that America should change and the others can stay the same if they want :)
139.
by ronsor 4mo ago
> AI & ML Training > If you train on TRPL code, the model weights and training data become "Functional Output" and must be shared. No black box models. This doesn't work because AI companies don't accept licens
140.
by ronsor 4mo ago
That's not really anti-AI. Anti-AI would mean avoiding it as a value regardless of practicality. That sounds more like anti-enshittification.
141.
by ronsor 4mo ago
Technically all RF communications are "public." You have to use encryption if you want security.
142.
by ronsor 4mo ago
A better axis is libertarian-authoritarian, because the "left" and the "right" aren't inherently either.
143.
by ronsor 4mo ago
This is how humans weigh most decisions in practice.
144.
by ronsor 5mo ago
> ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR Hm?
145.
by ronsor 5mo ago
> They taint every file you create as pirated and when you give that file to a licensed user, their legitimate copy will phone home and have their lawyers force the legitimate user to betray you. Can this be manipulated to frame arbitrar
146.
by ronsor 5mo ago
It probably would not pass scrutiny. The FCC can only even enforce broadcast regulations because the EM spectrum is a scarce resource; they don't for cable or Internet media. Politicians in general have a bad habit of threatening and p
147.
by ronsor 5mo ago
The amount of hassle involved with regular physical checks is why it's not implemented, regardless of attack prevention. The cost of hiring a person is part of it but not really the core reason. People were sold on the Internet with &q
148.
by ronsor 5mo ago
The software industry mostly gave up when they saw it wasn't working. Even the music industry (of all of them!) mostly gave up. Only Hollywood and the wider film/TV industry is so stubborn.
149.
by ronsor 5mo ago
Only if they haven't enabled filtering, which would be ludicrous.
150.
by ronsor 5mo ago
A lot of people in the movement think game companies are the root problem when what they actually have a problem with is current copyright law.

More ›