ronilav

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ronilav 6y ago

   > Treating unicode as something optional was fine for early 2000s, but it's really not fine today. The issues are: * how unicode support is implemented in third party libraries: how easy it turns out to manipulate this datatype with
2. 2.▲
   by ronilav 6y ago

   > looking at OCaml it just felt horrible care to elaborate?
3. 3.▲
   by ronilav 6y ago

   It's clear that closed source device makers will never want to prove that there are no HW backdoor, or even monitoring chip in their products, but for a device like this one, is there a will to provide such guarantee?