ronack

6 ms·

31.
by ronack 10y ago
You're right, lack of standardization and portability is a major problem. I would not personally choose IBM due to the pricing model and previous bad experiences. Google, Microsoft, and Facebook (and a bunch of startups) have all bui
32.
by ronack 10y ago
It's great to see so much competition in this space. This initial offering looks limited in its ability to handle more complex branching and context building but hopefully it will evolve. I'm also a little surprised at the prici
33.
by ronack 10y ago
For context, the founder of this site was in the news recently for being banned from YC: https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/12/pro-trump-ceo-gets-booted-...
34.
by ronack 10y ago
We had it raised to several thousand concurrent requests with no questions asked. YMMV based on age of account, amount of spend, etc.
35.
by ronack 10y ago
Ha! First result for this: site:producthunt.com mac voice control
36.
by ronack 10y ago
Totally agree, but in my example above I'm actually not even requiring vernacular mapping or any sort of conceptual disambiguation. Basic TF-IDF should rank that result pretty well and it certainly should not return 0 results. Great a
37.
by ronack 10y ago
Haven't tried the others, but Product Hunt's search is also extremely poor. Just today I searched for "mac voice control" (unquoted) and besides being very sluggish because of all the refreshing it does while I type, it
38.
by ronack 10y ago
In my experience, Algolia is OK for toy sites but not for anything even moderately complex. Even on HN it's often a challenge to find the right results. They seem to have gone with the philosophy that speed is more important than rele