Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
romwell
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
181.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
I have been really hoping that these myths would not be as prevalent today as they are. Personally, I've been greatly influenced by Feynman's great autobiography Surely you must be joking, Mr. Feynman! [1]. In it, the Noble-prize
182.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
I was hoping that this would be about computational geometry (and not, say, about the C shell or Powershell), and I am glad it indeed was. TL;DR: they are talking about approach to 3D geometry which avoids self-intersection by design, which
183.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
>I presume the first two bullet points felt obvious enough to not bother stating: of course you fix the code that crashed. I was not talking about the code that crashed . I guess what I wrote was non-obvious enough that it needs an ex
184.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
I guess "fight fire with fire" is great adage, so why not fight backdoors with backdoors. What can go wrong.
185.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
Oops. Noted! Apologies for inadvertently adding work! Somehow, I never realized that duplicate threads were merged (instead of one of them being nuked), because it seems like a lot of work in the first place. Thanks for doing it!
186.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
True, but the question is why they can keep getting away with that.
187.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
>I didn't see people explaining why this was ridiculous. Because of how it affects priorities and incentives. E.g.: as of 2024, CrowdStrike didn't implement staggered rollout of Rapid Response content. If you spend a second t
188.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
That is indeed necessary. But it seems to me that putting the interpreter in a place in the OS where it can cause a system crash with the be the behavior that it's allowed to do is a fundamental design choice that is not at all addre
189.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
>They did write that they intended to fix the bugs I strongly disagree. Add additional validation and enhance error handling say as much as "add band-aids and improve health" in response to a broken arm. Which is not some
190.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
Copying my content from the duplicate thread[1] here: This reads like a bunch of baloney to obscure the real problem. The only relevant part you need to see: >Due to a bug in the Content Validator, one of the two Template Instances pass
191.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
This reads like a bunch of baloney to obscure the real problem. The only relevant part you need to see: >Due to a bug in the Content Validator, one of the two Template Instances passed validation despite containing problematic content d
192.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
Yup, made it when I was just learning about ADHD while figuring out how many traits are applicable to me. 100+ pages in, I figured it's time to get myself assessed [1]. Went through the assessment three times with different doctors jus
193.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
I'm too lazy to bother with a bidet installation at home when the shower is right there . In public spaces, an option to use is is definitely appreciated.
194.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
Not to mention, TOVA scores are pure blocks that don't even claim to correlate with ADHD traits.
195.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
>Why is everything subscription based nowadays It makes more money for the people who peddle it, duh! >PS: Programming is absolutely fantastic, too, when you have ADHD Probably why I got into it (though Turbo Pascal / Delphi comp
196.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
From their own description, it has absolutely nothing to do with ADHD. As in: there's not even a claim it correlates with how strongly people experience ADHD symptoms.
197.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
I'm sorry, but have you looked at the TOVA API[1]? I have. Put simply, it's bullshit — and one that doesn't even purport to measure ADHD (which, indeed, is not something one could measure on a linear scale). It has nothing to
198.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
What "ADHD scores" are we talking about? There's no such thing as the "ADHD score".
199.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
Placebo effect for parents who pay money for this, I assume.
200.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
>Prescription stimulants are a common starting point for a lot of younger kids entering their programs right now. So is drinking water, I presume. This has "weed is a gateway drug" written all over it. >It’s not just pointle
201.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
Maybe read what you wrote instead? The words, not the gist . >The gist of it is that the failure was expected by everyone with technical knowledge of the seal. Nobody is denying that. What you wrote was, quote: "The seal performed
202.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
>The overuse of emphasization (heavy phrases, all caps, underline, bold, italic, exclamations, COMBINED!! :) ) for the sometimes later coming clear statement of facts (not needing emphasis because speak for themselves) is an irritating r
203.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
>The seal performed exactly as it was specified to. Yeah, no . The seal never performed the way it was designed to.[1] It was faulty by design . The seal always leaked, but that didn't always lead to an explosion. There were m
204.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
I can vouch for "Learn C The Hard Way" as well :)
205.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
>Like all elements of all crimes charged, it has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. What has to be proven? That they got money and used it to fund the operation isn't in question.
206.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
There were way more than 10 people who read, commented on, and liked that Verge article. Both your assumptions (that we're an extreme minority, and that Roku thinks that way) seem to be only supported by the conclusion you make from
207.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
Takes notes Those ideas read like poetry.
208.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
TL;DR: used EVs are "cheap" these days. As in, they're finally getting into a sub-$30K range. Meanwhile, I'm going to drive my 2010 Honda Fit (that I bought for $5K in 2017) practically forever. I'm making 6 figures
209.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
It's absolute bullshit because the crime (copyright violation) had not been proven at the time of the transaction, and without that, how does one know they're violating copyright vs. exercising fair use rights? It's almost
210.
▲
by
romwell
2y ago
Which is why Roku decided to take away the option to disable it for people who understand and notice the effect and actively don't want it ? Pardon me, it makes zero sense at all.
More ›