rohit2412

56 ms·

361.
by rohit2412 9y ago
I've never understood what their lead in batteries really is. Isn't it well known that Panasonic manufacturers and supplies battery cells to Tesla? And cost-wise LG Chem seems competitive enough to Panasonic anyway, keeping in min
362.
by rohit2412 9y ago
I don't agree with the reasoning. Since we all know that a few currency notes are stolen sometime, the entire usd cash system will be shut down?
363.
by rohit2412 9y ago
Considering that India is still industrializing, I'd argue 1 century later is massively better than 4 century later.
364.
by rohit2412 9y ago
Railways to take away raw materials. Educated? India's literacy rate in 1947 was 12% Look at british literacy rate when they became a big empire. https://www1.umassd.edu/ir/resources/laboreducation/litera
365.
by rohit2412 9y ago
Interesting. Its different in India, where it's not the salary but the prestige that drives people to become professors. Even the research opportunities are limited, and industry pays much more.
366.
by rohit2412 9y ago
> If we are going to hold Elon to his "we can do it for 1/8th the cost" blurb, then we are giving him like $8.5 billion to use for his SF/LA Hyperloop. Still, that doesn't sound unreasonable, right I think boring
367.
by rohit2412 9y ago
Same here in India. People oppose hsr train as a waste of money in favor of centuries old infrastructure. The same people also believe that if we should move to a new technology, it should be hyperloop, rejecting maglev on the way. They eit
368.
by rohit2412 9y ago
How much of the positive is the result of British empire? And does it offset poverty caused by centuries of colonialism?
369.
by rohit2412 9y ago
For Britain? Yes. India doesn't agree with your thesis.
370.
by rohit2412 9y ago
I believe Japan and Germanys still had an educated and skilled population. And working systems against corruption and rule of law in society.
371.
by rohit2412 9y ago
The statistics being touted for reduced accident include emergency breaking.
372.
by rohit2412 9y ago
Why are your options autopilot can unaided human? Wouldn't you compare autopilot va autopilot assisted human? That is, where the autopilot is a passive system that only comes into play to prevent accidents.
373.
by rohit2412 9y ago
What if Tesla released autopilot as a completely passive accident prevention driving assist? Tesla seems to be allowing only two options - one with no driving assistance, and one where they can call it autonomous.
374.
by rohit2412 9y ago
> suggest that autopilot is safer than a human driver. This is what is misleading in my opinion. The study says that Tesla's assistive technology works, that is they assist humans to make driving safer. All driving assistance techno
375.
by rohit2412 9y ago
I think you are being sarcastic, and people don't get it.
376.
by rohit2412 9y ago
Update: Just make sure yours are not counterfeit. http://www.prosolareclipse.cc/imageRepository/dff59a28-760c-...
377.
by rohit2412 9y ago
Hey, since I have the same glasses, this is what search lands me. AAS approved - https://eclipse.aas.org/resources/solar-filters Someone on this video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Jmdo5jJIeQ ) got
378.
by rohit2412 9y ago
That's what I disagree with. Tesla customers are just looking for the next status symbol. I have talked to enough tesla owners and fans to tell you that they haven't even heard of Renault Zoe or BYD ev300. And they would never con
379.
by rohit2412 9y ago
And Renault Zoe, and BYD ev300. There are electric cars available all round the world, but somehow Tesla got the hype up that they are the only one.
380.
by rohit2412 9y ago
Motors aren't a secret technology. And Panasonic makes the batteries and sells to Tesla. The only thing Tesla can sell as technology is Autopilot, which is just hyped up driver assistance. Have you even heard of electric cars like Rena