roghummal

14 ms·

91.
by roghummal 11y ago
Let's use an otherwise meaningless post to ask: Vi(m) users, when did you concede to emacs and why?
92.
by roghummal 11y ago
Can they? But they're made of meat. Meat that thinks?
93.
by roghummal 11y ago
Is that an official reason?
94.
by roghummal 11y ago
Hmm. >Sarcasm can be seen as 'inauthentic' and diminish the immediately perceived value of a piece. I'd rewrite this as such: "Sarcasm is seen as 'inauthentic' and diminishes the perceived value of the piece
95.
by roghummal 11y ago
So it was political, like I said. Not to kick 'em while they're down but it certainly wasn't on technical merit.
96.
by roghummal 11y ago
And in my opinion it's still very confusing. If there was a more confusing version of this message and it was refined to this then I'm inclined to believe the deception was intentional. libav is not the successor to ffmpeg. libav
97.
by roghummal 11y ago
Most of what I do with ffmpeg is change containers. Example: ffmpeg -i doom4_trailer.mkv -acodec copy -vcodec copy doom4_trailer.mp4 Pretty simple, right? libav: >[mp4 @ 0xa33800] Application provided invalid, non monotonically increasin
98.
by roghummal 11y ago
It's something in between. "The ffmpeg program is only provided for script compatibility and will be removed in a future release. It has been deprecated in the Libav project to allow for incompatible command line syntax improvemen
99.
by roghummal 11y ago
"Gen-Y places a high value on authenticity. Sarcasm can be seen as 'inauthentic' and diminish the immediately perceived value of a piece. Satire, however, is a goodthing. Sarcasm is cheap; Satire is art. ... Sarcasm is more e
100.
by roghummal 11y ago
I appreciated your contribution of sarcasm and I'm sorry if my playing off your sarcasm caused you grief. It's stupid that people downvoted (what's the HN euphemism for this?) your comment. It was appropriate. Keep commenting
101.
by roghummal 11y ago
In case someone takes his comment seriously, there's mine. In case someone takes my comment seriously they'd agree with the grandparent so no harm done. There's the chance someone would agree with the grand/parent (&#x27
102.
by roghummal 11y ago
Did you read the parent comment? What does tamper-proof mean to you? It's digitally signed and then the officer's recording system uploads it securely to the police servers when back at the station. This is all to maintain a compl
103.
by roghummal 11y ago
Edits in the middle should've been in NFO. Runtime is short. Good effort w/ the source. For a cam A3/V3.
104.
by roghummal 11y ago
This article doesn't properly projekt the magik of runes for one or more of the following reasons: 1. Runes are like magik (see my site runesaremagik.tumbler.com) 2. Who cares? Elvish. 3. Who cares? Klingon. 4. Who cares? ... everybody
105.
by roghummal 11y ago
That's a great way to force you to think about the words you choose to use.
106.
by roghummal 11y ago
I didn't see it anywhere either. Found it here http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal....
107.
by roghummal 11y ago
The article is available here http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal....
108.
by roghummal 11y ago
I'm on a roll tonight so I'll ask the dumb, easy question. What cipher/key size are you using? https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/FIPS_mode_and_TLS#TLS_1.2 isn't exactly a restrictive sets.
109.
by roghummal 11y ago
>Maybe(in 10-20 years) I've seen 20 years of progress. Yeah... not to discourage you; Keep on shooting for the stars.
110.
by roghummal 11y ago
>We already have software runtimes (various Javascript VMs, .NET, the JVM and its offshoots, etc) that can optimize code at runtime based on the hardware that's present, hotspots in the code, etc. Are you a hardware guy? :) Thanks f
111.
by roghummal 11y ago
What good is an FPGA if it isn't 'workload-specific'? That's what they do. That workload might be a processor, it might be an interface, ... you get it. Workload-specific FPGAs are here, now. They're not 'promi
112.
by roghummal 11y ago
HTML5 was an improvement. HTML6?
113.
by roghummal 11y ago
Intel's 7nm? Anyone?
114.
by roghummal 11y ago
The golden rule! He who has the something something something something etc. Don't know, don't care.
115.
by roghummal 11y ago
Only tens of thousands?
116.
by roghummal 11y ago
Civility works best with mutual respect. That respect might be hollow or fleeting but it's established and traded on. When two people meet for the first time there's a credit exchanged. That's the humanity-freebie. Don't
117.
by roghummal 11y ago
So I don't confuse you with an edit and for my own gratification, I'd like you to know that I didn't 'trawl' through your posts to find something that supported mine. Your titles are bait. Their substance is minimal
118.
by roghummal 11y ago
>Edit: It appears roghummal has significantly revised his comment since I finished my reply. It doesn't 'appear' that way, that's the way it is. My edit was, just guesstimating here, 25 minutes before your post? Edit
119.
by roghummal 11y ago
If it had we might be running it right now.
120.
by roghummal 11y ago
If you're ever in the Silicon Valley we should "meet up". I'll be nicer to you but you're buying.

More ›