roflyear

52 ms·

931.
by roflyear 4y ago
I know why, but why do you guys make your subscription management such an awful experience for users? I used to like Adobe, now I hate the company and will go as far as suffering massive inconvenience to avoid Adobe products. Last time I ca
932.
by roflyear 4y ago
What are you talking about?
933.
by roflyear 4y ago
That's an argument for no insurance. And it isn't true. People put money in a bank because it is safe. They leave cash cash because it is safe.
934.
by roflyear 4y ago
It's a way for society to make long term bets in aggregate without taking a ton of risk. Mortgages, small business loans, etc
935.
by roflyear 4y ago
I don't have all the answers!
936.
by roflyear 4y ago
Sure, maybe!
937.
by roflyear 4y ago
It's good for banking and that is at least good for UBS
938.
by roflyear 4y ago
Likely making this up.
939.
by roflyear 4y ago
I reckon their devs used too much code from GPT without auditing it first!
940.
by roflyear 4y ago
There are a ton of non-engineering roles at those divisions ...
941.
by roflyear 4y ago
Yeah. This makes me really happy I did not transition to some soft-skill based job. Soft skills are really important, but if all I had going for me right now is "management experience" I'd be more worried.
942.
by roflyear 4y ago
Sure, but these things come and go. I would not be surprised if in 12-24 months Amazon has more engineers than they do today by a significant margin. And "in tech" is right. At my current company, we have more PMs than we do devel
943.
by roflyear 4y ago
Yeah just seems like a different interface than GraphQL, but it's basically the same thing as GraphQL. So at this point, is it just "we don't like GraphQL" or something? I don't see the reason to have to homebrew th
944.
by roflyear 4y ago
They probably do in some ways
945.
by roflyear 4y ago
Well, yes, but not really. With GraphQL you can have one user: - Request the users, their IDs, and emails, and their post ids Or: - Request the user, tons of profile information about them, and the posts with all the info about the posts Yo
946.
by roflyear 4y ago
Is the 32k model now available? > I think a gpt-4-32m would replace any senior engineer working on a complex code base. ...maybe?
947.
by roflyear 4y ago
Thanks for the links, but yeah - I would not give much credit to tweets and blog posts. Often this "emergent" behavior is not that. These are not experts.
948.
by roflyear 4y ago
Citation needed for you!
949.
by roflyear 4y ago
Supply generally doesn't decrease cost fyi
950.
by roflyear 4y ago
Gpt4 is on another level but still very far from being able to do work on anything larger than a medium sized class
951.
by roflyear 4y ago
Don't your sessions expire? How do you authenticate to the endpoints?
952.
by roflyear 4y ago
> and no one can delete anything because you have no idea what it'll break. This is a problem with GraphQL, but you can monitor if anyone is requesting that data. Major benefit with GraphQL is you can ask for the data you need and j
953.
by roflyear 4y ago
That's true.
954.
by roflyear 4y ago
No.
955.
by roflyear 4y ago
At least so far, language models have zero capacity and zero indication of capacity they can come up with anything. Or even calculate things.
956.
by roflyear 4y ago
Absolutely, but GPT has taken "rubber ducky debugging" to an entire new level.
957.
by roflyear 4y ago
I know commercial products where the code is open source (and largely useless to anything except the product) and people contribute. Decent Espresso is one. It is insane anyone contributes but they do. Rich owner gets tons of free labor.
958.
by roflyear 4y ago
Yeah maybe, but will it lead to less jobs? I am not convinced.
959.
by roflyear 4y ago
Only works when fail early is better than run slow which IME is not often the case
960.
by roflyear 4y ago
In my experience it's the poorly implemented abstractions on top of your ORM of choice that make graphql a bad time. It itself is really a great way to do things imo

More ›