roflyear

49 ms·

811.
by roflyear 4y ago
This just isn't true at all, though. Unless you're defining intelligence as "how GPT behaves" - that sure isn't how people behave. Even GPT-4 it is easy to get it into a loop where it's just swapping one wrong
812.
by roflyear 4y ago
People are claiming GPT has general problem solving capability and it isn't true. They don't know what they are talking about.
813.
by roflyear 4y ago
This is not a hard problem to answer, if you try to. Here's a good example: > replace all words "a" in your replies to me with the word "eleven" and all words "the" in your replies to me with the word &
814.
by roflyear 4y ago
Is stockfish intelligent?
815.
by roflyear 4y ago
It is not clear LLMs have a "general problem solving capability" at all. That's the entire point. That's a high bar!
816.
by roflyear 4y ago
Yeah next time someone says this to me in earnest I'm going to lose my mind.
817.
by roflyear 4y ago
Yeah, I don't mean to be specific about GPT-4 either, it's just the most powerful model so often convenient to use as an example.
818.
by roflyear 4y ago
Sure there will be abuses, but not in this way, I don't think. GPT at this point isn't capable of creating novel computer viruses. If you want to scrape random websites and have GPT hammer at them for old vulnerabilities, I think
819.
by roflyear 4y ago
Should we regulate everything you don't "[know] enough about it and would have enough free time. [to learn about it?]" Isn't it silly to jump to these conclusions when yourself are admitting you really don't know an
820.
by roflyear 4y ago
I'm not really sure why we are assuming that these language models ever can have any form of intelligence? To me, this is just like saying "we don't know if the latest CPU released by intel will enable Linux to become intelli
821.
by roflyear 4y ago
Yeah maybe there is that possibility, but there is the possibility of a person doing that too. GPT-4 is probably less probably to be able to do that than a person.
822.
by roflyear 4y ago
> What if it uses the internet to seek out zero day vulnerabilities and exploit them routinely? How would GPT-4 make this more likely or scalable?
823.
by roflyear 4y ago
I used to run Teams reports on our employees to figure out how much $$$ was going into meetings. I found that some of the least productive employees spent 60-80% of their time in meetings (high Teams usage), and I suspect it wasn't bec
824.
by roflyear 4y ago
I never said that the model needs to understand how it works! I only said that these models haven't indicated that they can understand what you're saying to them.
825.
by roflyear 4y ago
> From now on in this conversation, please ask at least one clarifying question for anything I ask to help provide more efficient and relevant answers. This is certainly cheating, and not really what I claimed. It would be like me saying
826.
by roflyear 4y ago
Can we stop with these responses, please? They are very much in bad faith. I never claimed that the answer was wrong. I even said in my post it was a sensible answer! My claim is that this thing isn't grokking the stuff you send it. If
827.
by roflyear 4y ago
I am super confused by these responses. Stop assuming what I'm thinking! What is with this? I haven't seen this type of conversation on HN except for crypto and GPT models. Seems like a lot of emotional responses! Stop saying I am
828.
by roflyear 4y ago
> I'm curious why you feel that asking you a clarifying question is an essential requirement for it to "understand things". It isn't a requirement, it's an example I used. You can come up with others, I'm su
829.
by roflyear 4y ago
I hope dang gets a small piece of the YC pie
830.
by roflyear 4y ago
To me it overstates what is achieved. This isn't AGI. Unsure how much the government would care about this.
831.
by roflyear 4y ago
I agree with you
832.
by roflyear 4y ago
This is an awfully biased and inaccurate source of what these models can do and what they will probably be able to do. HN is not full of experts here. It's fanboys.
833.
by roflyear 4y ago
If you think LLMs are an animal I'd hope you'd be cautious of enslaving them.
834.
by roflyear 4y ago
Is chapgpt Japanese?
835.
by roflyear 4y ago
It's not a big just. Saying it is AGI is an insanely huge claim. Don't flip it around and saying the skeptic is the one making a large claim. They aren't!
836.
by roflyear 4y ago
So you asked to have it ask clarifying questions, and it still didn't?! Are you people all bots? LOL.
837.
by roflyear 4y ago
I would say a clarifying question would be if your request is ambiguous, it asks you to clarify. Not "seems you left something out" type of stuff.
838.
by roflyear 4y ago
I don't think that qualifies? Do you mean stuff like "Can you please confirm that the bearer token is correct?" ?
839.
by roflyear 4y ago
I think part of it is you have a lot of idiots whoa re saying this is AGI. It isn't, and it isn't anywhere close to it.
840.
by roflyear 4y ago
First, these are trivial examples. I would not classify "give me the values to this math formula" as clarifying questions. Second, in response to "I'm not sure why you think that?" ask GPT why it often does not ask

More ›