rodneyrehm

3 ms·

1.
by rodneyrehm 13y ago
Most interesting in the regard of (eventually) being able to replace Selenium in our stack. While currently in an early stage - it will be capable of doing pretty much everything Selenium can do - without requiring Java. Functional / U
2.
Automated cross browser testing with JavaScript(dalekjs.com)
2 points by rodneyrehm 13y ago|1 comments
3.
Open Device Labs(opendevicelab.com)
1 points by rodneyrehm 14y ago|0 comments
4.
Hey Twitter, here's an idea(blog.rodneyrehm.de)
1 points by rodneyrehm 14y ago|0 comments
5.
by rodneyrehm 14y ago
While I doubt a javascript-space sorting implementation runs any faster than a C++ implementation could, there are some implementations around, http://millermedeiros.github.com/amd-utils/array.html#sort for example.
6.
by rodneyrehm 14y ago
http://blog.rodneyrehm.de/archives/14-Sorting-Were-Doing-It-... may be of [some] interest here, too.
7.
Gentoo Linux on the MacBook Pro 8,2 (late 2011)(ck.kennt-wayne.de)
1 points by rodneyrehm 14y ago|0 comments
8.
by rodneyrehm 15y ago
URI.js now has a feature to test equality of URIs - medialize.github.com/URI.js/docs.html#equals - is that what you were looking for?
9.
by rodneyrehm 15y ago
It is dual-licensed, MIT and GPL. Choose the MIT License to do what the f k you like. Choose the GPL License if you're building some GPL software yourself, and need all the components to be GPL-licensed as well. Maybe have a look at http:
10.
by rodneyrehm 15y ago
Funny… URI.js is more or less a port of my PHP URL class. Zend Framework has one. look at https://gist.github.com/1499238 to get you started. (Not a chainable API and not as powerful as URI.js either). The path resolving can be taken from
11.
by rodneyrehm 15y ago
window.location.search - https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.location#Propert... and decomposed IDL - http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/...
12.
by rodneyrehm 15y ago
That is noted in README.md of URI.js - you can also find a (very simple) performance comparison here: http://jsperf.com/idl-attributes-vs-uri-js Does the IDL stuff work in non-browser Javascript (like node.js)?
13.
by rodneyrehm 15y ago
Do you honestly think I ever thought about my dimwit-no-rocket-science URI.js ending up on hacker news? But, to satisfy hacker news readers, I added the terms "fluent interface" and "method chaining" (while preserving "jQuery-like" for norm
14.
by rodneyrehm 15y ago
According to Google's Closure Compiler URI.js is compiled down to 11.81KB (3.38KB gzipped) Including punycode.js and IPv6.js you get 15.03KB (4.87KB gzipped) added your link to the alternatives section in README.md
15.
by rodneyrehm 15y ago
I figured more people understand "jQuery-style" than "fluent interface" / "method chaining". Pretty much like you call a tissue "Kleenex" (or "Tempo" in German).
16.
by rodneyrehm 15y ago
replaced "facility" by "library"…
17.
by rodneyrehm 15y ago
they just fixed it…
18.
by rodneyrehm 15y ago
"search" is the term for "query string" used throughout javascript. I prefer "query" (as in "query string"). I use query(), but made search() available to those, who are used to window.location.search for some more groaning, have a look at
19.
by rodneyrehm 15y ago
Github has a nice little feature called issue tracking. Feel free to post your thoughts there. I'd be happy to figure something out. URI.js wasn't intended to limit anyone in what they were trying to do. It just never occured to me that ?fo