roderik

4 ms·

1.
by roderik 15y ago
Thats not the point, the point is if INDEC lies or not. Maybe in the metric used by INDEC, 15% is unbearable high
2.
by roderik 15y ago
Sorry, I didnt mean to be harsh. I wanted to point that your comment is not actually relevant to the topic, and its distracting. Good luck!
3.
by roderik 15y ago
Well, you keep talking about me instead about the topic,and I dont understand why you are disrespectful with my person. I will go back to reading on Logic, mi topic for this week. I got "Metalogic" from Hunter. Really, sorry for the noise.
4.
by roderik 15y ago
Yes, of course, but that doesnt prove anything about INDEC. The index does not measure the changes in that way. Please, dont call me "irrational", it clearly doesnt apply, I think that I have a reasonable argument that of course can be wron
5.
by roderik 15y ago
So, in this metric, 10% of inflation is high, right? and another countries can use a different metric, and in fact, they do. Each economy is different, if you cant produce energy by natural caracteristics of your country, your economy could
6.
by roderik 15y ago
I dont understand why do you react like that. I am not joking. Read carefuly. My salary increased more than 4x, but that doesnt prove you wrong right? Statistics doenst work that way. Sorry if I offended you by having a different opinion, b
7.
by roderik 15y ago
yes
8.
by roderik 15y ago
There is some titles tied to inflation iirc
9.
by roderik 15y ago
Wut? Argentina had 10 years of recesion, with actual deflation. Inflation is not the norm in the last 30 years.
10.
by roderik 15y ago
There is no "citation needed" meme. There is two metrics (or many, one from the .gov and the others from private analysts) and everybody repeats that one is wrong without explaining why. I have no interest in defending the .ar goverment, bu
11.
by roderik 15y ago
And why we should care about that? Please guys...
12.
by roderik 15y ago
Well, they are blind trusting the privates right? The comments here have not many data supporting the arguments. "I live here" is not good enough, ever heard about antropological fallacy?