Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
roboticmind
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
31.
▲
by
roboticmind
4y ago
This is a false dichotomy. Plenty of people do whole foods plant-based diets without those. Additionally, it's also often replacing highly processed meats
32.
▲
by
roboticmind
4y ago
> There is not one shed of science that can suggest with any amount of confidence that eliminating livestock will make a difference with global warming meaningful enough to justify not being able to eat the food that we developed to sub
33.
▲
by
roboticmind
4y ago
If you keep emitting that methane, then it continues to persist and leads to problems with climate change. Unfortunately this can only reduced a bit with changes to farming practices in the meat industry > people that argue that we shoul
34.
▲
by
roboticmind
4y ago
It is worth noting that this doesn't just look at things in the 90's, but goes all the way out to 2011
35.
▲
Soviet Union’s collapse led to drop in carbon emissions (2019)
(nature.com)
5 points
by
roboticmind
4y ago
|
4 comments
36.
▲
by
roboticmind
5y ago
Worth pointing out that the energy may matter more on a per mass basis than strictly per volume in some applications. By looking at MJ/kg, Hydrogen even beats out gasoline[1] although that's not the case for per unit volume[2] Spe
37.
▲
by
roboticmind
5y ago
I think for cars that's probably the case, but that might be too focused on cars. A possible future for it might be for large planes, boats, etc. that would really need the higher energy density of hydrogen vs batteries. The inefficien
38.
▲
by
roboticmind
5y ago
Firefox has this too. You can do it the network tab[1] or in the Responsive Design Mode[2]. There's drop downs there where you can control how much you want to throttle [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs&
39.
▲
by
roboticmind
5y ago
I assume they are saying that because you wouldn't want something where someone could do a MITM and insert arbitrary bash commands through $() or other similar things
40.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
The devs have mostly not sold coins. See for instance one of the core devs, Jim Owens, who still has over a million Gridcoin and continues to run BOINC and earn more from even just that (and has been running BOINC since BOINC started over 1
41.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
I'm not sure that the second option is a very pythonic way to do it, but that's subjective of course. I'd imagine the original commenter views using a lot of ifs and elifs as the pythonic way to do it
42.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
Developers are not making any new Gridcoin. The only compensation the developers get is through transactions from the foundation address[1] which only gets and has gotten coins from 1) people sending coins to it and 2) the one time transact
43.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
That is not what I said at all. Those are your own words. I've already explained in that thread why the "no one would actually pay for" part is false as well, and you are mixing up different things here. No new coins are mint
44.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
Ah yeah I should have mentioned that its PoS and that PoR is not really a thing anymore[1]. It's proof of stake that makes the actual blocks. The research rewards are just added on top of staking. Even all the project just suddenly shu
45.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
I also realized that I should have mention that I'm not sure you could always identify which tasks were the checks you were looking for For that scenario you mentioned, you'd not get any more tasks, as projects have limits on how
46.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
It's worth noting that one project only accounts for 1/19th of the current rewards for research and 0 of the rewards for staking. They do not have near complete control of the monetary supply. As well, as more projects are added t
47.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
I agree with the other commenters that the best way to get an idea of it is to look at it yourself. It's hard to trust people in general, so that's why I left it in for more transparency. I think that's an issue that goes to
48.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
If someone has the level of processing power to get a majority of a project's tasks, I think it would go very quickly noticed, and the project admin can just up their task validation higher making it much harder (e.g send to 4 random c
49.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
I think you may be missing what Gridcoin is doing. It is not going to the scientists themselves, but the people using their computers to help scientists. As well, I believe many of the projects Gridcoin rewards are grant funded (separate fr
50.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
The BOINC projects run checks on the work a user submit. Usually it involves sending out the same work to two random different people and seeing if they match
51.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
Since I last used it, it looks like there has been a lot of work on manim in the community fork [1]. It used to definitely be a fair amount of work to figure things out, but it looks like things are easier now. I remember having to dig thro
52.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
I just want to note that I meant originally for the 5.0.0 work the developers didn't request compensation, and so it hasn't been sent just yet since it the request was recent. It has nothing to do with being paid in Gridcoin or no
53.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
Maybe backed was a bad word to use. I more just meant that it's creation is linked with scientific work having been done. That it has a value linked to helping science - not a direct one to one thing you can exchange for helping scienc
54.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
> Once you have some oracle... > ...single entity that you must trust... It's not a single oracle. There are currently 6 that independently run and gather the same stats. The wallet compares each of those independent oracle'
55.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
That's correct that the requirement to be on team Gridcoin was removed in 5.0.0. You can now earn Gridcoin from any BOINC team. The manual rewards claim is still in the works although there's now some more specific plans in mind [
56.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
Ah that makes more sense I see using it a currency backed by scientific work is already something that makes using it unique and can make people interested in accepting it and use it. I see that you don't view it the same way, but that
57.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
Originally the main developers didn't request any compensation for this, but yes they will be compensated in Gridcoin. The reason for this is partly that Gridcoin is really community run and doesn't have much USD or other fiat jus
58.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
I'd agree that it is more centralized than I'd like, but it doesn't defeat the whole point. Gridcoin has a different purpose than most cryptocurrencies. It rewards science and is more decentralized than most coins that try si
59.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
It's worth noting that a lot of work (4500+ hours in ten months of development and testing[1]) has been put into a massive rewrite of the wallet in 5.0.0. The wallet is a lot more stable than it was when you last used it, the GUI is mu
60.
▲
by
roboticmind
6y ago
For those reading and not familiar with Gridcoin and BOINC, I should note that BOINC is separate from Gridcoin. The threads about BOINC are indeed related, but about a slightly different topic. Just wanted to note that since I have seen som
More ›